Search for: "White v. United States"
Results 821 - 840
of 6,561
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2012, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 7:59 am
United States. [read post]
12 May 2014, 7:47 am
United States and BG Group v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
A growing global problem is the so-called illicit whites or cheap whites. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 12:12 pm
Padilla was an al Queda solider who formerly fought against the United States and ordering the Secretary to take Mr. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
United States, 599 U.S. ____ (2023). [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:18 pm
White; Paul B. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 4:41 am
In ALLEN WOLFSON, -v- AVRAHAM MOSKOWITZ, 08 Civ. 8796 (DLC);UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK'; 2009 U.S. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 7:11 am
United States, the Court remanded a case for resentencing where the defendant complained that he was not an Armed Career Criminal. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
, the United States Supreme Court issued its first decision interpreting the so-called white collar exemptions under the Fair Labor Standards Act and finally resolved the circuit split over whether pharmaceutical sales representatives are exempt as outside salespeople. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 pm
Waxman representing i4i, and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stuart arguing as amicus curiae on behalf of the United States in support of i4i. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
United States, 12-6355, concerning the proper application of the categorical analysis in Shepard v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
Moreover, under United States v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm
If a drug company, in 1995, marketed antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) for the prevention of cerebral palsy (CP) in the United States, the government might well have prosecuted the company for misbranding. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:26 pm
White (1869) for the proposition that states may not secede. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 9:41 am
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm
: GPO, United States Commission of Civil Rights, 1970. [read post]
