Search for: "Whiting v. City of National City"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,362
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2015, 11:37 am
The capture of Qaryatain creates a clear route between the city of Palmyra and the Qalamun region near Damascus, both held by ISIS. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:37 am
The capture of Qaryatain creates a clear route between the city of Palmyra and the Qalamun region near Damascus, both held by ISIS. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:30 am
") Remember Ricci v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 10:56 am
Note-1: Ex-Department of Justice official Jeff Clark, who was formerly CC4, was dropped in the superseding indictment as a co-conspirator following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Missouri Legislative Employee's Pro-Mask-Mandate Speech Protected by First Amendment
23 Jun 2022, 5:28 am
From Mayfield v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
But that is just one of her long list of firsts — Bolin also went on to become the first Black woman to join the New York City Bar Association and the New York City Law Department. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:19 am
Russia still controls Kherson city, the regional capital, in the south. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 9:29 am
In Ricci v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 8:56 am
Timothy Jackson, Jr., Carlos Moore, President-elect of the National Chapter of the National Bar Association, and Just City. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 8:12 am
Timothy Jackson, Jr., Carlos Moore, President-elect of the National Chapter of the National Bar Association, and Just City — called on Shelby County District Attorney General Amy Weirich to join the request to test the DNA evidence in Mr. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:08 am
See Swann v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
The act is a violation of the Clean Water Act, the federal law aimed at protecting our nation’s waters. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:06 pm
Justices White, Powell, Stevens, and Blackmun voted to reverse. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:52 am
Coleman served as co-counsel with Thurgood Marshall in Brown v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
” Drawing from case law concerning non-presidential obstruction, Hemel and Posner posit a “but-for motive” standard to resolve such cases: “If the president would have taken the challenged action for national security reasons or in executing his responsibility to take care that the laws are faithfully executed, then that fact should immunize him from obstruction liability,” even if other motives are provable. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:22 am
The ruling in the case of Texas Department of Housing v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 7:09 am
The student expressed disappointment in Ginsburg’s majority opinion in City of Sherrill v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:08 am
Jacobsen (drug testing a small amount of white powder) and U.S. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
After Bush v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:32 am
White, 548 U.S. 53, 61-62 (2006) (citing 42 U.S.C. sec. 2000e-2(a)). [read post]
