Search for: "Wife B v. Husband B"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2008, 8:05 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:16 am
The couple continues to live together as husband and wife, which is exactly what Michelle and Michael did. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm
David B. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
(b) “Mobile home” is as defined in Section 57-16-3. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:53 am
The wife resisted the effort to modify support, citing Mandelbaum v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 1:46 pm
Supreme Court case of U.S. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
[v]iolate any provision [of this section or] [b]e on duty or operate a commercial motor vehicle if, by the driver's general appearance or conduct or by other substantiating evidence, the driver appears to have used alcohol within the preceding 4 hours. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:35 am
Thus, the CaseyCourt struck down a spousal notification provision that was eerily reminiscent of the common law’s enforcement of a hierarchical relationship between husband and wife. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 2:33 am
Liability in relation to the other two – TLU and TLV (respectively the wife and daughter of TLT) – was disputed. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
In fact, the record shows that Husband himself failed to comply with Wife's requests for discovery. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:28 am
Hair v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Family Court Act § 412(2)(d), Domestic Relations Law § 236B(5-a)(b)(5) and § 236B(6)(b)(4) were amended to fix the date of the biennial adjustment of the temporary, post-divorce and spousal maintenance "income caps" at March 1" rather than January 31', as currently provided. [read post]
9 May 2016, 5:53 am
From Higbie v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:18 am
The wife's share included the unencumbered former marital residence, appraised at $250,000, and a payment received from the husband in the amount of $110,000. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:14 am
Glass v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:41 pm
Finally, for our purposes, ss.198-201 which would abolish a husband's common law duty to maintain his wife and the presumption of advancement are yet to be brought into force. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:41 pm
Finally, for our purposes, ss.198-201 which would abolish a husband's common law duty to maintain his wife and the presumption of advancement are yet to be brought into force. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
The Court observed that foster parents apply for the subsidy prior to adoption (18 NYCRR 421.24 [b], [c][1]), and sign a contract with ACS (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][3]). [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
The Court observed that foster parents apply for the subsidy prior to adoption (18 NYCRR 421.24 [b], [c][1]), and sign a contract with ACS (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][3]). [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 10:38 am
For example, if a husband or wife receives an inheritance during the course of a marriage, it becomes separate property. [read post]
