Search for: "eBay, Inc."
Results 821 - 840
of 1,375
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2011, 3:32 pm
In UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 11:00 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani with additional comments from Eric] UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:43 pm
Augusto somehow obtained a bunch of these promotional CDs and re-sold them on eBay. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 7:28 am
The New York Times reports that Facebook, Inc. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:50 am
eBay Domestic Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:44 am
The complaint named Spansion, Inc. and Spansion, LLC (collectively, “Spansion”), Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:33 am
Trademark * Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc, 2010 WL 3416635 (U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:38 pm
Consolidated Edison Company of New York Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court C D California: For divided infringement, proof of agency not required to establish ‘direction and control’: Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:58 am
§ 1337 (d)(1) was akin to the factors enumerated in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 pm
Alloc, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 12:36 pm
On Friday, August 27, 2010, Interval Research Corporation (a Paul Allen non-practicing entity) brought a patent infringement lawsuit against a who’s who of tech companies in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington at Seattle, specifically suing AOL, Inc., Apple, Inc., eBay, Inc., Facebook, Inc., Google Inc., Netflix, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., OfficeMax Inc., Staples, Inc.,… [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:00 am
The Rosetta Stone case also involves nominative fair use issues, similar to the 2nd Circuit case Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., 600 F.3d 93, (2d Cir. 2010), where the 2nd Circuit held that a defendant “may lawfully use a plaintiff's trademark where doing so is necessary to describe the plaintiff’s product and does not imply a false affiliation or endorsement by the plaintiff of the defendant. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 12:56 pm
Inc., Ebay Inc., Electronic Arts Inc., General Motors LLC, Hewlett Packard Company, McAfee, Inc., Red Hat, Inc., and Symantec Corporation in Support of Petitioner The Federal Circuit Bar Association in Support of Neither Party The Intellectual Property Owners Association in Support of Neither Party [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 11:16 am
(Inand Capitol Records, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:09 am
As Bloomberg, Law & Disorder, and the Wall Street Journal all report, the Court denied cert. in Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v eBay, a trademark infringement suit. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:23 pm
The high court refused to hear an appeal from Tiffany Inc. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:07 am
The denied case was Tiffany v. eBay Inc. (10-300). [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 11:56 am
Charneski issued the public version of Order No. 14 granting Complainant Farouk System, Inc. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:30 am
As explained recently by the Supreme Court in eBay v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 6:09 am
"The Supreme Court's decision will have a substantial impact on what goods retailers, especially those on-line retailers such as eBay or Amazon, can sell and import into the U.S. eBay, Intel, Amazon and Target have all voiced support for Costco. [read post]
