Search for: "v. SCHWARTZ"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,647
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2010, 9:10 am
Schwartz, Moderator, Bullivant Houser Bailey PC David W. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:48 pm
In the recentdecision, Shammas v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Schwartz, Moderator, Bullivant Houser Bailey PC David W. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:10 am
Rosa DeLauro [D-Conn.] introduce bill to overturn SCOTUS’s Wal-Mart v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 5:01 pm
Daniel Schwartz of the Connecticut Employment Law Blog discusses the practical impacts. [read post]
10 May 2018, 2:55 am
” [Chris Edwards, Cato on Janus v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 6:20 am
In his column for The Nation, Herman Schwartz criticizes the Court’s recent decision in Florence v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:24 pm
Senior and former Chief Judge Schwartz may not necessarily know how to specifically define a "depraved mind", but like Potter Stewart ala pornography, he knows it when he sees it, and he minces no words in describing it in Bonilla v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 4:10 am
Schwartz,No. 07-1249-pr;UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT;2009 U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:59 am
The oral arguments this week in Biden v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
The Comptroller is vested with the exclusive authority to resolve applications for retirement benefits and the "determination must be upheld if [the] interpretation of the controlling retirement statute is reasonable and the underlying factual findings are supported by substantial evidence" (Matter of Schwartz v McCall, 300 AD2d 887, 888 [3d Dept 2002] [internal citations omitted]; accord Matter of O'Brien v DiNapoli, 116 AD3d 1124, 1125 [3d Dept… [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
The Comptroller is vested with the exclusive authority to resolve applications for retirement benefits and the "determination must be upheld if [the] interpretation of the controlling retirement statute is reasonable and the underlying factual findings are supported by substantial evidence" (Matter of Schwartz v McCall, 300 AD2d 887, 888 [3d Dept 2002] [internal citations omitted]; accord Matter of O'Brien v DiNapoli, 116 AD3d 1124, 1125 [3d Dept… [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
The Comptroller is vested with the exclusive authority to resolve applications for retirement benefits and the "determination must be upheld if [the] interpretation of the controlling retirement statute is reasonable and the underlying factual findings are supported by substantial evidence" (Matter of Schwartz v McCall, 300 AD2d 887, 888 [3d Dept 2002] [internal citations omitted]; accord Matter of O'Brien v DiNapoli, 116 AD3d 1124, 1125 [3d Dept… [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
The Comptroller is vested with the exclusive authority to resolve applications for retirement benefits and the "determination must be upheld if [the] interpretation of the controlling retirement statute is reasonable and the underlying factual findings are supported by substantial evidence" (Matter of Schwartz v McCall, 300 AD2d 887, 888 [3d Dept 2002] [internal citations omitted]; accord Matter of O'Brien v DiNapoli, 116 AD3d 1124, 1125 [3d Dept… [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 8:42 am
” As law professor Joanna Schwartz explains, Hope v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
In its January 11, 2017 decision in DeFilippis v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 5:34 am
From Judge Paul Engelmayer (S.D.N.Y.) in Johnson v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 5:00 am
Recently, our Miami personal injury attorneys read a case in which the Florida Supreme Court issued a decision in Friedrich v. [read post]
4 Nov 2005, 1:45 pm
Previously, I discussed those aspects of Edenbaum v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:27 am
Today brings a bonus second post, because the Supreme Court just released its long-awaited ruling in Christopher v. [read post]
