Search for: "*u.s. v. Govern"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 41,771
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2020, 2:24 pm
The Casa de Maryland v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 1:01 pm
Dep’t of Labor v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 10:46 am
U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 10:34 am
AOL and Reno v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am
Here is what the Joint Committee on Reconstruction had to say in 1866 about an argument they made similar to that of Baude and Sachs: “It is more than idle, it is a mockery, to contend that a people who have thrown off their allegiance, destroyed the local government which bound their States to the Union as members thereof, defied its authority, refused to execute its laws, and abrogated every provision which gave them political rights within the Union, still retain,… [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 5:52 am
Anders, and Sabastian V. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Monsanto, 2020 U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
The civil antitrust case in the Northern District of Illinois, Maplevale Farms Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
Trump also reinstated the Mexico City Policy, also known as the “global gag rule,” that prohibits foreign non-governmental organizations from receiving U.S. aid if they perform abortions, even if funded with non-U.S. money, or provide any information about abortion to patients or clients. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm
Since the Court invalidated the Privacy Shield due to concerns regarding U.S. government access to EU personal data, the Court’s reasoning may also create obstacles for parties seeking to verify that an importer in the U.S. can ensure adequate data protection to comply with SCCs. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
Alex Feerst, one of the great thinkers about Internet content moderation, has a revealing metaphor about the real-world work involved. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm
U.S. asylum officers are in the main dedicated and capable, but judicial review of asylum decisions at the U.S. border is exceedingly limited—limits that the Supreme Court upheld on June 25 in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 8:50 am
(Shanghai Jahwa) v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 8:22 am
Christensen, 2013 U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 8:10 am
The government referenced Vasquez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
Jones v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:29 am
In filings submitted last week, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the Bureau) both opposed and moved for summary judgment in PayPal, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 1:56 pm
Find all of the latest updates at narf.org/nill/bulletins/U.S. [read post]
