Search for: "California Department of Justice"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 9,827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2010, 11:31 am
Pennsylvania has asked the Justice Department to delay implementation until July 2011. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 5:46 pm
For a complete copy of the Department of Justice Press Release, click here. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:38 pm
But the Harrisonburg Police Department didn’t stop there. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm
Quon, a case involving a California police department reading private text messages from the pager of one of the department’s employees. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:48 am
The city of Ontario, California is asking the justices to overturn a ruling by the U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 8:18 am
" Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor reports that "Supreme Court takes up 'sexting' privacy case; The Supreme Court heard arguments Monday in the case of a California police officer who sued when records from his department-issued pager were submitted to internal affairs; He had used the pager for sending sexually explicit text messages, or 'sexting.'" The Press-Enterprise of Riverside, California reports that "U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 8:16 am
Well, Justice Kennedy may not be able to make your phone blow up, but AMK did display a keen understanding of the SCA, raising the issue of whether the police department should have been able to get access to the pager transcripts at all. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 7:11 am
Kurt Boshart of the Harrisonburg Police Department. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
The case involved Sergeant Jeff Quon, a southern California SWAT team officer, who used police department equipment to send sexually explicit messages to a girlfriend. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:42 am
The case examines whether a California police department violated the constitutional rights of an employee when it inspected personal text messages sent and received by a pager owned by the city of Ontario, Calif. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:40 pm
Quon, the Court is reviewing a the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling that the City of Ontario (California) Police Department violated the Fourth Amendment rights of SWAT officer Jeff Quon by reviewing text messages sent and received by Quon using a City-provided pager and messaging service. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 2:56 pm
The case examines whether a California police department violated the constitutional rights of an employee when it inspected personal text messages sent and received by a pager owned by the city of Ontario, Calif. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 12:22 pm
The case examines whether a California police department violated the constitutional rights of an employee when it inspected personal text messages sent and received by a pager owned by the city of Ontario, Calif. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 7:17 am
In the fall of 1943 I found myself enduring the rigors of boot camp in San Diego, California. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 4:25 pm
Supreme Court Short List Profiles: Justice Carlos Moreno of the California Supreme Court - Los Angeles lawyer Christina Imre of Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold on the firm's blog, The Appellate Strategist Reason No. 5 Not To Cruise: If You Are Retired Or A Child, The Cruise Line Considers Your Life Worthless - Miami attorney Jim Walker of Walker & O'Neill on his blog, Cruise Law News ACLU and North Carolina Department of Corrections… [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm
Arguing for the California city and its police department will be Kent L. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:57 pm
He also received a $100,000 fine and three years’ supervised release, according to the Justice Department. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 8:30 am
From 1994 to 1997, he served as the Deputy Chief of the Environmental Crimes Section in the United States Department of Justice. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:56 pm
He previously spent close to ten years at the Department of Justice primarily in the office of the Solicitor General and also worked in corporate transactions at Sullivan & Cromwell. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
California, 545 U.S. 162 (2005), that a State could not impose the burden on a defendant claiming a racially discriminatory striking of a juror pursuant to Batson v. [read post]
