Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 8381 - 8400 of 12,883
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2012, 10:14 am by Douglas Reiser
But employers need to be assured that (a) the system will work correctly, (b) the government can timely fix errors that won’t disturb the workflow and (c) use of the system is made simple, with adequate training available. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:46 am by Rosalind English
The US and the UK websites  remain distinct bodies, and provided the tortious act is clearly attributable to Company A and not Company B, B will not be liable even if the man who committed that act on A’s behalf (and may well be personally liable for it) is also the guiding mind of B. [read post]
15 May 2012, 10:22 am by Hakemi
  i)     On February 12, 2007, a press release announced approval of the transaction by authorities under the Investment Canada Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. 28 (1st Supp.), and provided the names of the executives for the new company. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
The exemption is subject to three requirements, one of which is that the issuer must file a notice of transaction with the Department of Corporations (see 10 CCR § 260.102.19(c)). [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:45 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
., adequate water supplies and provisions for rest areas); (b) emergency planning and response; (c) worker acclimatization periods; (d) modified work schedules (i.e., planning heavy work early in the day); and (e) training. [read post]
14 May 2012, 5:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The amount due as of the actuarial study as of December 31, 2011, is now $4,683,529, which amount consists of (a) $155,981 in Stipulated Deductible Premium; (b) $6,333,131 in Paid Losses and Allocated Loss Adjustment Expense (“ALAE”); (c) $703,613 in Case Reserves Losses and ALAE; (d) $720,264 in Unallocated Loss Adjustment Expense (“ULAE”) Reserves; and (e) a credit or surplus of $3,229,460 for Incurred But Not Reported (“IBNR”) Losses and ALAE.… [read post]
13 May 2012, 10:00 pm by Nietzer
    the company has a clear issued policy regarding gifts and hospitality, 2. [read post]
13 May 2012, 8:20 am
 Allergan also based their grounds on Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(4) of the Regulation. [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:55 am by INFORRM
This provides that ‘(1) In any proceedings to which this subsection applies a person shall not be excused, by reason that to do so would tend to expose that person … to proceedings for a related offence … : (a) from answering any question put to that person in the first-mentioned proceedings; or (b) from complying with any order made in those proceedings. (2) Subsection (1) applies to the following civil proceedings in the High Court, namely: (a) proceedings for… [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am by Blog  Editorial
  This provides that ‘(1)     In any proceedings to which this subsection applies a person shall not be excused, by reason that to do so would tend to expose that person … to proceedings for a related offence … : (a) from answering any question put to that person in the first-mentioned proceedings; or (b) from complying with any order made in those proceedings. (2) Subsection (1) applies to the following civil proceedings in the High Court,… [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:43 am by Kevin Healey
Claims between policyholders and their insurance companies can seem simple. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (b) Which should have happened under the current system, right?) [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:15 pm
The appellate court rejected at the outset the defendant’s contention that the district court abused its discretion by not accepting his initial binding plea agreement under Rule 11(c)(1)(C) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. [read post]