Search for: "Does 1-100" Results 8381 - 8400 of 14,034
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2013, 2:13 am by Florian Mueller
Even if Microsoft prevailed 100%, the amount wouldn't be a threat to cash-rich Google. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 6:44 am by Ariel J. Greenberg
” According to the complaint, the Piatigorsky Collection arrived at the warehouse at 100 Imlay Street in Red Hook on October 18, 2012, about a week before Sandy hit. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:51 pm
 It's super tough for an overworked fish and game person to tell whether 1 in 50, or 1 in 100, crabs are undersized. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 10:28 am by Jonathan Bailey
Thicke, along with collaborators Pharrell Williams and T.I., filed a lawsuit against the family of Marvin Gaye and a company that owns the rights to several George Clinton songs, seeking a judgment that “Blurred Lines” does not infringe either Gaye’s song “Got to Give it Up” or Clinton’s song “Sexy Ways”. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
The distribution of $200 reduces A’s adjusted basis in the partnership interest to zero, and generates gain of $100 under section 731(a)(1) ($200 minus $100). [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 6:02 pm by Brian Cuban
  If  Amazon does not tell them for 1-3 weeks there is nothing to print or ship. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In particular with regard to fresh grounds for opposition, for the above reasons the Enlarged Board considers that such grounds may in principle not be introduced at the appeal stage” (emphasis added by the Board).[1.3.1] As admitted by the [patent proprietor] at the OPs clarity does not represent a ground of opposition as specified in A 100(a) to 100(c). [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 10:47 am by Brittney Steele
However, a driver caught violating the statute is subject to the following: 346.89(1) Inattentive driving: Fine of $20 to $400 and four point demerit 346.89(3)(a) Texting & driving: Fine of $20 to $400 and four point demerit 346.89(4) Probationary license: Fine $20-$40 for the first offense, and $50 -$100 for subsequent convictions within a year See Wis. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
It is true that in the present case the OD has not made use of this possibility, but this does not alter the fact that the new ground for opposition pursuant to A 100(c) was adduced during the opposition proceedings and, therefore, does not constitute a new ground that had been put forth for the first time during the appeal proceedings (cf. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:28 am by Doug Cornelius
Ohio is claiming that SoMoLend violated that ban and therefore does not qualify for the exemption from registration under Ohio law. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:28 am by Doug Cornelius
Ohio is claiming that SoMoLend violated that ban and therefore does not qualify for the exemption from registration under Ohio law. [read post]