Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 15,525
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2014, 8:05 pm
Reminder: federal panel finally mulling reform of ultra-costly pretrial discovery, now’s the time to send comments [Kyl/WSJ, earlier] Michigan woman convicted of false rape claim had sent man to prison for 10 years in earlier case [ABA Journal] Strickland, key figure in disastrous CPSIA law and then chief at NHTSA, lands at BigLaw’s Venable [AutoNews, Detroit News] A religious accommodation too far? [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:01 am
In Fein v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:35 am
And in Gillette v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
The tricky part is figuring out when to aggregate multiple transmissions of a performance. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 1:21 pm
The lower courts have divided deeply trying to figure out the issue. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 1:15 pm
UNHCR and the Politics of Numbers," Michael Kagan revisits one of his older notes on how many Sudanese live in Egypt.People Affected by Conflict 2013: Humanitarian Needs in Numbers (CRED, Dec. 2013) [text via ReliefWeb]- Represents "the first systematic attempt to produce objective and comparable figures for all people affected by conflict (PAC)."" [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
King’s net income even approached such a figure. [read post]
Case Law, Strasbourg: Ruusunen v Finland, The Private of Life of a Prime Minister – Dominic Crossley
20 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
Referring to the test set out in Von Hannover (No 2) the Court commented “the Court notes that it was equally clear that the former Prime Minister had been a public figure at the time when the book was published. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 12:28 am
In support of its position, the insurer relied on case law (including the Seventh Circuit’s 2001 opinion in Level 3 Communications Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 12:28 am
In support of its position, the insurer relied on case law (including the Seventh Circuit’s 2001 opinion in Level 3 Communications Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
In Gertz v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 1:39 pm
“So holds today’s Obsidian Finance Group v. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 12:21 pm
Declined to deem Padrick and Obsidian "public figures", a status that would have required them, under The New York Times Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:52 pm
This is most notable in West Virginia Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:49 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 3:13 pm
Alternatively, perhaps the Justices figured that the issue can arise with many different facts, and they figured taking two cases lets them look at the broader issue (see, for example, Miranda v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 11:42 am
While NYT v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:34 am
(Eugene Volokh) So holds today’s Obsidian Finance Group v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:17 am
True enough, when we got the judgment for seven (theoretical) figures in Louis Vuitton v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:05 am
Anyway, you read a bit more about these figures, which are preliminary and will be confirmed and added to on 6 March, here. [read post]
