Search for: "IN RE GRANT" Results 8381 - 8400 of 37,625
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2015, 5:00 am by Kate Fort
The California Rules of Court include that in their definition of active efforts: We note that the California Supreme Court is currently reviewing the validity of California Rules of Court, rules 5.482(c) and 5.484(c) in In re Abbigail A. (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 1450, review granted September 10, 2014, S220187. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
If you’re like me, you’re saying “what continuance? [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 9:56 am
If you have been granted TPS or deferred action, you are eligible to apply for advance parole. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:52 am by Beth Graham
In In re Professional Pharmacy II, No. 2-10-163-CV, (Tex. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 9:56 am
If you have been granted TPS or deferred action, you are eligible to apply for advance parole. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  The Court granted the application. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:54 am by Berry Law Firm
  New and material evidence concerning the matter can re-open the claim, with the new “effective date” being the date of the re-opening filing for benefits. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
It’s a summary of all Appeals, Oral Judgments and Leaves to Appeal granted from March 15 – May 15, 2024 inclusive. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 7:21 am by dhdlaw
  This coverage is granted in accordance with “strict liability” principles. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 3:20 pm by marketing
For a second offense within five years, you cannot get a restricted license for the first year, so that’s one year of no driving followed by two years of restricted driving if you’re eligible and the court will grant you an restricted license. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:42 am by R. David Donoghue
  Here are key rulings: Motorola granted summary judgment of noninfringement re RE 39,486 and U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 8:23 pm
That case was later dismissed without decision (as improvidently granted). [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
A number of important recent decisions have re-emphasised the principle of open justice. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 12:03 pm by Eddy Salcedo
 The District Court found IDG's contentions that it did not materially breach the agreement and that Schupp acquiesced to a modification of the NCA consistent with New York decisional authority involving employment agreements similar to the NCA, citing: In re Footstar, Inc., 04-22350, 2007 Bankr.LEXIS 2302, at *12-13 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]