Search for: "Laws v. Laws"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 269,217
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2024, 4:59 am
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:44 am
Julie Tsirkin, Monica Alba, Frank Thorp V and Rebecca Kaplan report for NBC News. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
In the case of Coates v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
In the case of Coates v. [read post]
A Con Law Exam Featuring A Barter Ban, Discrimination Against an AroAce Couple, and Campaign Finance
17 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
The Myrontana legislature legalized same-sex marriage in 2010, five years before the Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:36 am
Third, under the circumstances of this case, the commencement of a bankruptcy proceeding and the listing of Young/Sommer as a creditor in the bankruptcy petition did not terminate the attorney-client relationship as a matter of law. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:30 am
Raimondo and Relentless Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:30 am
For nearly four decades the Court did not consider the rule and its exceptions until Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:17 am
In the context of cross-border cases, the latter interpretation would thus allow each Member State to determine, based on their own conflict-of-laws rules, the law applicable to the defendant’s duty of care in cases of violations of data protection laws. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 pm
Mmabasotho Christinah Olesitse N.O. v Minister of Police (CCT 183/22) [2023] ZACC 35 (14 November 2023) (saflii.org) [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
” Since the time to amend the pleading as of right had expired, and plaintiff hadn’t complied with the governing procedural prerequisite, the Appellate Division, Second Department, was of the view that omission rendered the amended complaint a “legal nullity,” which justified its dismissal as against those new parties.There was clearly no amending that.# # #DECISIONBodkin v 112 Automotive Ctr., Inc. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 3:12 pm
Moore v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:53 pm
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm
(NA)Today the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Devillier v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:35 pm
The laws and guidelines governing federal sentencing have two things in common: uncertainty and complexity. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:24 pm
(Dunkelman v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm
The consequences of well-timed short attacks against issuers experiencing an increasing stock price are notably impactful, particularly when short-sellers disseminate negative information that may not necessarily be of material fact and required to be made public in accordance with the federal securities laws. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm
We note, however, that questions about the domain of inquiry—of in-market vs. out-of-market effects—can arise in conduct cases brought under Section 1 of the Sherman Act (as in Ohio v American Express, where the Supreme Court considered both sides of a two-sided transactional platform as a single market) or under Section 2 (as in Aspen Skiing Co., where the Court, considering allegedly exclusionary conduct, held that “it is appropriate to examine the effect of the… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:35 pm
Near the end of 2023, the United States Supreme Court declined to consider the City of Costa Mesa’s appeal of a January Ninth Circuit ruling in SoCal Recovery, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
It is named after the Supreme Court’s 1984 opinion in Chevron v. [read post]
