Search for: "M v. M"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 52,887
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm
As I said, I'm eminently familiar with that insult, since it's been used in approximately 250 opinions in the California Court of Appeal alone.Coincidentally enough, today's opinion mentions that the perpetrator called the victim "Chapete. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
I'm certain that there are many people who would categorically agree with Justice Poochigian when he says in this opinion:"The interests of justice are not furthered by excluding truthful, relevant evidence needed to prosecute criminals. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 8:39 am
" As I read further, yep, I was indeed not surprised by the ultimate result.But my second thought was, honestly: "I know I'm old, but Judge Wallace has to be really getting up there, no? [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 12:56 pm
I'm used to seeing 70+ opinions in murder cases -- typically, death penalty cases -- in the California Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:29 pm
I'm not going to recite all of the (horrible) details of this death penalty case. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:09 pm
Olympic Committee) in various sports.I'm not saying that's bad or good from a normative perspective. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 1:03 pm
I'm not sure how anyone could reasonably disagree with Judge Nguyen's opinion here.The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act says that you can't file a debt collection lawsuit in the wrong forum. [read post]
24 May 2016, 2:59 pm
I'm not sure why the City of San Diego filed an appeal in this one.Here's how the Ninth Circuit describes the case: "In October of 2010, officers with the San Diego Police Department responded to a report that two armed black males had been seen in the parking lot of an apartment complex. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 10:26 am
That's the test.I'm certain that that's what the panel was implicitly thinking anyway. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 2:18 pm
Christie's convictions.I'm certain it was good while it lasted, though. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 11:19 am
And I‟m going to take this on a writ. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:11 pm
I'm confident that readers of this blog are not surprised when they're struck from a jury panel. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 12:03 pm
I'm fairly confident that Chief Judge Kozinski's opinion in this case correctly summarizes existing precedent. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 12:46 pm
Moreover, Justice Corrigan's reasoning in this regard seems very persuasive to me.So I'm definitely pleased with the result.Yet the structure of the opinion itself leaves me somewhat hollow.There's essentially seventeen pages of extensive history -- in particular, the various conflicting opinions by the Court of Appeal on the subject -- followed by six pages of analysis and result.I understand why opinions are sometimes written that way. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 12:32 pm
Mendoza, given the overwhelming evidence against him on the molestation counts, I'm fairly confident his plight does not create overwhelming sympathy for his legal position in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:27 pm
I'm using the phrase "pretty important" as a deliberate understatement. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:53 pm
I'm confident that everyone up there knows about the place, even though it's small. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:51 pm
All to try to avoid some taxes.I'm not in a position to place blame. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 11:01 am
"But I'm not sure that the next three sentences of his conclusion follow from that premise; e.g., that "All parties in litigation are entitled to a fair trial. [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:44 am
I can say with certainty that the majority of law review articles aren't nearly as good as Judge Bybee's concurrence.Which does not necessarily mean that I'm persuaded by Judge Bybee's approach. [read post]
