Search for: "M. B.1." Results 8381 - 8400 of 13,699
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2012, 1:05 pm
Também, pela inconstitucionalidade dos §§ 1º e 2º do art. 84 do CPP e pela remessa dos autos ao setor criminal da Procuradoria da República no Estado da Bahia. [read post]
15 May 2012, 11:03 am by Steve
Long, Jr., of Montgomery, as a judge of the Twenty-seventh Judicial Circuit for a term of eight years commencing July 1, 2012.The Honorable Sage B. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:52 am by (admin)
Para o gamer paulistano que não pode se identificar, “Diablo III” surpreendeu – Ele conta que, na manhã desta terça-feira, já estava no nível 14 com o seu personagem (todos começam no nível 1), um bárbaro que recebeu o nome de Conan, como no filme. [read post]
13 May 2012, 10:00 pm by Nietzer
My concern is that some of the tickets for popular events run into thousands of pounds and so I’m concerned that the amount is too much. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
The principles in R (M) v Slough Borough Council [2008] UKHL 52 should be applied, both as to the threshold for s.21(1)(a), met "as soon as a person can be said to be in need of some care and attention, even to a relatively small degree" [Lord Neuberger in M] and considering current and prospective need: Having regard to the principles set out in M in relation to current and prospective need (at [35], [55]), it will be a question of fact in each case… [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
The principles in R (M) v Slough Borough Council [2008] UKHL 52 should be applied, both as to the threshold for s.21(1)(a), met "as soon as a person can be said to be in need of some care and attention, even to a relatively small degree" [Lord Neuberger in M] and considering current and prospective need: Having regard to the principles set out in M in relation to current and prospective need (at [35], [55]), it will be a question of fact in each case… [read post]
11 May 2012, 11:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Editing software: b-reveal 3. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:52 am by Susan Brenner
In New York, the Appellate Division held that, `[b]ank records . . . belong to the bank. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (b) Which should have happened under the current system, right?) [read post]
10 May 2012, 10:26 am by Eugene Volokh
So it looks like public criticism of speech restrictions, even ones that seem to target supposed “bullying” or “harassment,” has worked in this instance; I’m very glad to see that. [read post]