Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 8381 - 8400 of 19,806
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2008, 1:32 pm
I mostly agree, although I would emphasize that: a) a truly determined litigant will bring a case no matter what the movement lawyers want, and so amicus representation can't stop the case from appearing before the Supremes (or any other court) when the rogue brings it; and b) amicus presentation just isn't a full substitute for being lead counsel, especially if oral argument makes a difference.But now I want to stress a different point by way of… [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:11 pm by royblack
Apparently lawyers in the New York courts are unhindered by FRE 608(b). [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 12:39 pm
You can't cut corners on either one. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 3:35 am by SHG
Ziv gives the excuse for why, no matter what the case, it proves guilt. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 5:07 am by Charles Sartain
We won’t waste your time on the how’s and why’s of the old act. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 2:22 pm by Steven Koprince
The GAO wrote that “[t]he Small Business Act gives the [SBA], not our Office, the conclusive authority to determine matters of small business status for federal procurements. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 12:21 pm by Attorney Author
 He will aggressively try those cases that need to be tried and negotiate favorable settlements in those that shouldn’t be. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:23 am by Michael O'Hear
 It can never be known with certainty how the evidence will come in at trial, and, in the heat of pretrial preparations, we shouldn’t be surprised if prosecutors often take an overly optimistic view of things — which might lead to the suppression of information that would, in fact, prove quite helpful to the defense. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 1:00 pm by CharlesB
Below is a description from The Motley Fool about when this may matter for a family. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 5:59 pm by anne
  In the Post column, “The law doesn’t care about whistleblowers’ grudges,” Mueller writes that “[b]oth demonizing and canonizing whistleblowers are pointless exercises. [read post]