Search for: "Mark Harms"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 10,422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2011, 5:44 am
Abercrombie is claiming irreparable harm to the company’s goodwill and reputation. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm
" Mark Similarity. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:29 pm
See my reviews of recent books by Andrew Keen, Mark Helprin, Lee Siegel and even to some extent Jaron Lanier. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 8:28 am
If a private-sector lawyer, representing any harmed party, settled for damages without an investigation of actual damages they would likely be exposing themselves to malpractice, why would that not be the case here? [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Pound Sterling and Franc versus the Mark. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Pound Sterling and Franc versus the Mark. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:51 am
These clauses cover quite a bit of ground and are intended to curtail Acme's liability to the point where any potential liability for harm suffered by something other than gross negligence (you can't contract your way out of liability for gross negligence) or wilful misconduct should be pretty limited. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:59 am
"Each case label bears the establishment number "EST. 27" inside the USDA mark of inspection. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:02 am
Mark Lemley: filters suck. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:53 pm
(Statement by the WHO Director-General, Dr Margaret Chan, on the Occasion of the 100th Anniversary of International Women’s Day) This year, we mark a century of women as agents of change to improve their lives, communities and health. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm
Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody's, put that number at 700,000 jobs. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
This article originally ran in December 0f 2009, but I’m reposting it because maybe it will be read by someone who will find it even the least bit interesting. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 5:28 am
Instead he argues ( similar to the Judges in McKennitt ) that we should try and distinguish between harmless and harmful hypocrisies and should only worry about the most damaging varieties. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:56 am
The statutory penalty is not calibrated to the size or economic strength of the defendant, the significance of the product, or to the degree of competitive harm the false marking may have had beyond simply the gross number of articles falsely marked. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:25 am
To recover, a plaintiff must show that the conduct at issue caused harm that was truly severe. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:59 am
As such, certain synthetic materials are allowed to be incorporated into the production and handling of organic foods as long as the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB), an expert advisory panel, and the Secretary of Agriculture find that the substance is not harmful to human health or the environment, is necessary to production because of unavailability of natural products, and is consistent with organic ideals. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:33 am
If scientific estimates are close to the mark (and especially if we persist in delaying serious mitigation efforts), climate change will put something like one-fourth of our species at risk of extinction in the next century. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:21 am
S. 830, 837 (1996) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
A jury may conclude, however, that Bonds was worried more about how accepting the immunity offer would have harmed his baseball legacy than about how declining the offer would have harmed his legal standing.* * *To read the rest, click here. [read post]
