Search for: "People v Word" Results 8381 - 8400 of 17,918
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2015, 4:00 pm by Mitch Stoltz
On Friday, the major US movie studios quietly backed away from the worst parts of the censorship power-grab they attempted in July in the Paramount v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm by Carl Vennitti
Prior to July of 2003, V&V Enterprises, Inc., did business as Mauro Brand Products and been marketing and selling “pocket sandwiches” since coming under inspection by the USDA in 1991. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 (When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:51 pm by Kevin
Or so said Justice Scalia, answering a nutty hypothetical question he asked himself whilst concurring in Mullenix v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:22 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
” As Egyptian president Abdel Fattah el-Sisi visited the seaside tourist town of Sharm el-Sheikh for the first time since the crash, he sought to “reassure people” and maintained that the government "will announce the results with absolute transparency and clarity," the Times tells us. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am by John Elwood
The petitioner in that case, a firearm-appreciating doctor who is among the tiny handful of people not running for president … yet, challenges a Highland Park, Illinois ordinance banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:11 am by INFORRM
Dr Duffy then brought proceedings for libel, pleading a broad range of defamatory imputations including that she stalked psychics; obsessively and persistently harassed psychics; fraudulently and/or maliciously accessed other people’s electronic emails and materials; spread lies; threatened and manipulated other people; was an embarrassment to her profession; misused her work email address for private purposes and engaged in criminal conduct. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 9:44 am by Ronald Mann
 And then as it progressed, there were people thought we need some cleanup authority or maybe even people just thought these rules aren’t working in the way that we want them to work. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
As a result the ECJ handed down its judgment in September this year.The case of Société Des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd (European Court of Justice) dealt with an application for a trademark by Nestle for a three-dimensional representation of the Kit Kat bar, omitting the embossed words "Kit Kat" from the top of the chocolate bar's individual fingers. [read post]