Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 41,400
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2020, 6:48 am
The arbitrator emphasized that another provision of the contract limited Georgia-Pacific’s power “to discipline and discharge employees to just cause. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
Given the extent of personal information on an individual’s phone, such searches have been found to contravene Fourth Amendment protections; in Riley v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:43 pm
Citing last term’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:19 pm
Hungary v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
United States, a case involving the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 6:45 am
"* With respect New York State governors issuing a "state pardon or reprieve," Article IV, §4 of New York State's Constitution provides that the "governor shall have the power to grant reprieves, commutations and pardons after conviction, for all offenses except treason and cases of impeachment, upon such conditions and with such restrictions and limitations, as he or she may think proper, subject to such regulations as may be… [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 12:00 am
"* With respect New York State governors issuing a "state pardon or reprieve," Article IV, §4 of New York State's Constitution provides that the "governor shall have the power to grant reprieves, commutations and pardons after conviction, for all offenses except treason and cases of impeachment, upon such conditions and with such restrictions and limitations, as he or she may think proper, subject to such regulations as may be… [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 5:19 pm
Haile held it wasn't a state constitutional mandate, citing Powers v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 4:28 pm
Batalla Vidal et al., v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:31 pm
EMW Women’s Surgical Center, P.S.C. 20-601Issues: (1) Whether a state attorney general vested with the power to defend state law should be permitted to intervene after a federal court of appeals invalidates a state statute when no other state actor will defend the law; and (2) whether, if so, the Supreme Court should vacate the judgment below and remand for further consideration in light of June Medical Services, L.L.C. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Franklin v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:52 pm
Respondent, the Warden of the Louisiana State Penitentiary, argues that the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) limits the powers of federal courts to overturn state criminal proceedings. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:40 pm
As the Supreme Court recognized in the Reno v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:40 am
In Muransky v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
It was not until 2017—more than two decades after United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 5:35 am
[UQ v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Sacramento v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
In the case of Janus v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 8:00 am
The guilty verdict was appealed to the Supreme Court in the case Miranda v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
In McNally v. [read post]
