Search for: "State v. Black"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 9,198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
”The difficulty here is that many states, having refused to legislate in favour of text and data-mining, are presumably not convinced of their merit. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am
Ghiotto, Traffic Stop Federalism: Protecting North Carolina Black Drivers From the United States Supreme Court, 48 U. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:00 pm
It's a prosecutor-v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 1:52 am
Hau: Personal involvement as a prerequisite for European tort jurisdiction at the centre of the plaintiff’s interests The case Mittelbayerischer Verlag KG v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:25 am
Thus, the interests of those who were devising the decision converged with the interests of the black plaintiffs. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am
Straut, Due Process Disestablishment: Why Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 2:34 pm
In response, policyholders have argued (with varying degrees of success from state to state) that public policy concerns are the properly left to the legislative branch. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
But to most of the building world, the study was an undeserved black eye on green building. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:07 am
The more recent decision in Innovention Toys v MGA Entertainment (Fed Cir., Mar 21 2011) though perhaps less factually clear-cut also ruled that the art there cited was analogous. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 9:36 am
From Evans v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:30 pm
” (Tiffany A. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:38 am
Ketanji Brown Jackson becomes the first black woman to be confirmed to the United States Supreme Court by the US Senate in a 53-47 vote. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Box 7851 Madison, WI 53707-7851 Phone: (608) 266-9329 Web: http://www.dhfs.state.wi.us State Developmental Disabilities Planning Council Wisconsin Council on Developmental Disabilities 600 Williamson Street P.O. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 1:13 pm
In addition to the scheduled events mentioned here, there are a number of issues that merit watching but that do not have a fixed date for developments to take place: ACA Internat’l v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am
Here’s Why That Won’t Happen.Center for Public Integrity – Sarah Kleiner | Published: 8/31/2017 Seizing on the specter of Russian election influence, Democrats have ramped up their quixotic effort to blunt Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
The plea gets its name from 1970’s North Carolina v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 4:43 pm
The case illustrated the length to which the state will sometimes litigate to prevent embarrassing information being made public. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:20 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 2:28 pm
The Supreme Court decided Grutter v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 11:50 pm
Moreover, once Goldberg replaced Frankfurter and White replaced Whittaker in 1962, there was a six person liberal majority for civil rights legislation (I should note, however, that one of the six, Hugo Black, dissented in South Carolina v. [read post]
