Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 8381 - 8400 of 15,318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2012, 7:12 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
That income, revealed later on the couple’s US income tax return, could render the non-work-authorized spouse ineligible to adjust status to lawful permanent residence under INA 245(c). [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:49 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of the United States (grant, vacate, remand in light of Federal Reserve Board’s interpretation of the regulations) Supplemental brief of respondent Title: Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:22 pm by Russell Knight
“(1) The amount of the alternate payee’s benefit shall be the result of (A/B) x C x D where: “A” equals the number of months of (check only one) regular regular plus permissive other service that the member accumulated in the Retirement System from the date of marriage (enter date MM/DD/YYYY) to the date of divorce (enter date MM/DD/YYYY). [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:36 pm
Starring in the latest development of Apple v Samsung [or, more properly, Samsung v Apple; Merpel notes that actions for declaration of non-infringement appear to be back-to-front: where infringement is alleged, it is usually in the form of a counterclaim brought by the defendant] is the Rechtbank 's-Gravenhage (The Hague District Court). [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
In determining whether technology is reasonably available, consideration should be given to factors including: (a) The lawyer’s or law firm’s practice areas; (b) The geographic locations of the lawyer’s or firm’s practice; and (c) The requirements of clients. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm by Dorothy
MORGAN d/b/a SAINTS & SCHOLARS TATTOOS, Appellee. 2nd District.Insurance -- Automobile -- Appraisal -- Attorney's fees -- Where insurer demanded appraisal of stolen vehicle, and insured failed to comply with appraisal clause but filed suit prematurely, insured was not entitled to award of attorney's fees for that phase of trial court proceedings - [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:25 pm
(c)(1) The provisions of subsection (b) of this section may not be applied to an action for damages for an injury: (i) To the reproductive system of the claimant; or (ii) Caused by a foreign object negligently left in the claimant's body [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:57 am by Bernard Bell
United States, 295 U.S. 602, 628-29 (1935)(limiting the holding in Myers v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:36 pm by Nikki Siesel
The reasons why a trademark owner can benefit from registration are due to the presumptions that attach under the Lanham Act, specifically Sections 7(b) and 7(c) (15 U.S.C. [read post]