Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 9,094
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2014, 7:00 am
Rules of Court, rule 5.2(d); Elkins v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 4:28 am
No, all you need to do is know when to go with a dissent from another district:We recognize that shortly after Campbell, the First District Court of Appeal, in Jefferson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 8:49 pm
See FTC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 5:21 pm
” The court concluded that the district court erred in determining that Defense Costs did not erode the policy limit. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 6:04 pm
United States District Court. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 9:14 am
From L.W. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:54 am
" Patterson v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
For coauthored papers, the presenting author is listed first. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
” The above hypothetical was very much analogous to the school district asbestos property damage class action, in which some plaintiffs’ counsel sought to hold all defendants jointly and severally liable. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:27 am
Last year, in District Attorney’s Office v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 7:26 pm
Similarly, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the EEOC’s pregnancy discrimination guidance in Young v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 12:00 am
The district court granted the motion and Pacific Coast appealed. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
Issa would also like the district court to adjudicate the FTC's antitrust case now. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 11:11 am
Campfield v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 4:13 am
Kobayashi v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 5:11 am
Q: Courts have imposed a materiality requirement in Lanham Act false advertising cases, and some have even required specific evidence that a false statement is material - e.g., Pizza Hut Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
(The Prior Art) Suggestions for fixing the US patent system (IP Watchdog) Obscure patent: Scriptured outdoor furniture (IP Watchdog) Published applications as prior art (Patently-O) Requester success rates in inter partes re-examination (Patently-O) Innovation Alliance video (Patently-O) Question on dedication of material (Patently-O) Bilski case: Financial services, patent experts seek more certainty on business-method patents (Intellectual Property Watch) US Patents –… [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 12:01 am
It stated that it decided only that “the federal courts have jurisdiction to determine the legality of the Executive’s potentially indefinite detention of individuals who claim to be wholly innocent of wrongdoing” and sent the case back “for the District Court to consider in the first instance the merits of [the detainees’] claims. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 10:23 am
District Court, E.D.N.Y.; # 08-2413; 3/4/09). [read post]
