Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 9,094
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2009, 5:15 am
However, in other cases, GE had previously convinced the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals (Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee) and US District Court of Connecticut that its principal place of business was New York. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 10:25 am
Summers v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 6:36 pm
The district court focused on the fact that most of MDE's advertising was in the form of "pay-per-click" advertisements (which typically did not include the ISPWest mark) - efforts that the court stated "creates little to no brand awareness. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:53 am
Tafas v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 12:56 pm
Supreme Court ruling on Vaden V. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 7:16 am
On March 17, 2009, the First Superior Court of the First Judicial District of Panama affirmed a ruling for lack of jurisdiction in Sara Grant Tobal et al v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 7:53 pm
The California Appellate Court decided both cases (Henderson v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 6:00 pm
Here, the Fifth Circuit first explained the reasoning behind limited judicial role in the arbitration process. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 4:00 pm
In City of Stockton v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 11:44 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 7:57 am
" United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 12:06 am
Supreme Court decisions in this area are quite specific with regard to your rights as follows: Lefkowitz v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 5:30 am
The district court remands the case to California state court and the 9th Circuit affirms. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 9:41 am
Tenenbaum, expire, the RIAA has filed a document it calls a "notice" stating that In response to the District Court's March 4, 2009, Order, Plaintiffs note that the District Court's January 14, 2009, Order has been stayed by the First Circuit Court of Appeals and that any issues surrounding that Order are currently pending in the First Circuit. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:45 am
The trial judge, in turn, tossed the search, and last week the 8th District unanimously affirmed in State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 4:40 pm
As the Court stated, judicial review is highly deferential to agencies' interpretations of their own regulations, and an agency's interpretation should be upheld unless "plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:42 pm
Some commentators are criticizing the Obama administration's position in the case: District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 5:32 pm
RULING: The Supreme Court has established the criteria for final agency actions: In Bennett v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
District Court in Boston under the name of Gill v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:49 am
The Court noted in Rohda v. [read post]
