Search for: "State v. S. R. R."
Results 8381 - 8400
of 71,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2014, 6:42 am
In its recent controversial decision in Halbig v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 2:42 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Thomas v Jeffery & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 693 (31 May 2012) Cherry Tree Investments Ltd v Landmain Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 736 (31 May 2012) Generics (UK) Ltd v Yeda Research & Development Co Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 726 (31 May 2012) Patel & Ors v MRD Property Developments Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 727 (31 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Majeed v R. [2012] EWCA Crim 1186 (31 May 2012) High… [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:53 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Global Process Systems Inc & Anor v Berhad [2009] EWCA Civ 1398 (17 December 2009) Boots Company Plc v HM Revenue & Customs [2009] EWCA Civ 1396 (17 December 2009) National Navigation Co v Endesa Generacion SA [2009] EWCA Civ 1397 (17 December 2009) Cooper & Ors v Fanmailuk.Com Ltd & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 1368 (17 December 2009) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Fleet v Fleet [2009] EWHC… [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
Canby, Richard R. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 3:07 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 6/7/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard… [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 4:24 am
Accordingly, we agree with the Supreme Court’s determination to grant the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the cause of action for an account stated and dismissing the defendant’s counterclaims. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
In Brinkley v Monterey Financial Services Inc., the Ninth Circuit vacated the district court’s remand order, and held that a plaintiff cannot remand an otherwise valid CAFA case to state court when only a portion of the class meets the two-thirds citizenship requirement. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 4:34 am
Facts: This case (Johnson v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 7:00 am
Kinley v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:15 am
See Continental Circuits LLC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
Dunham v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 6:28 am
Costa Rica, Clayton and Bilcon v Canada, Spence v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:43 am
Hidy v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:24 pm
However, in Pliva v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
(Designers Guild Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:44 am
See Iowa Assurance Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:10 am
From Bilski v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:10 am
From Bilski v. [read post]
