Search for: "State v. S. R. R."
Results 8381 - 8400
of 71,798
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2019, 12:14 pm
Rev. (2019) This Article asks whether Brooks v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:40 am
For example, the Excess Lines Association of New York requires that surplus lines premium taxes be remitted “only to New York for New York ‘home stated’ [RPG] members” while recognizing that “other states may handle [RPG] filings differently and consider the ‘insured’s home state’ to be the state where the [RPG] is headquartered . . . . [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:50 am
Ahlering and Andrew R. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:17 am
Facts: This case (Martinez et al v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 6:15 am
The employee stated that his addiction did not impact or interfere with his work and the employer agreed that there was no issue with the employee’s work. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 6:11 am
There's no rhyme or reason to any of this except what's politically useful. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:56 pm
First, consider yesterday's decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm
On 2 July 2019, Advocate General (AG) Bobek delivered his opinion in Case C-240/18 P Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), advising that the EUIPO’s decision to reject the registration of the trade mark ‘Fack Ju Göhte’ because it was too offensive should be annulled. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm
Br. at 8 (citing State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm
Br. at 8 (citing State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm
Br. at 8 (citing State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 1:51 pm
Andrews in CFL Technologies LLC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:51 am
That’s not bias or discrimination, it’s “editorial discretion”–and it’s what we want and expect from every publisher. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:36 am
The census citizenship question case (New York et al. v Dep't of Commerce, back in the SDNY after remand from the Supreme Court in June) has taken a strange new turn. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:03 am
R. 7A. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:11 am
Since damages in a legal malpractice case are designed “to make the injured client whole” (Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe, 76 NY2d 38, 42 [1990]), having failed to plead actual damages, plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim (see Heritage Partners, LLC v Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 133 AD3d 428 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 904 [2016]; Lavanant v General Acc. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 2:48 am
This recent case – EQT Production Co. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
In the case of Gumby v. [read post]
