Search for: "State v. Save"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 11,766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2011, 2:25 pm
Keith Lee of An Associates Mind comes out strong: Facebook You v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:31 am
Reemployment of public retireesConnolly v McCall, CA2, 254 F.3d 36 Section 150 of the Civil Service Law and Section 211 of the Retirement and Social Security Law [RSSL] set out the rules governing the reemployment for compensation of an individual receiving a retirement allowance from a New York public retirement system. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:18 pm
See, e.g., Crews v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 12:08 pm
V. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:55 am
See People v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:08 am
This was one of the main reasons relied upon by the Judge in OTG v Barke. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:48 am
Five years later, in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:53 am
The loss of you life savings and home. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:30 am
Drennan, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:49 am
The State has better luck in the remaining cases, and there’s little of note in any of them, save possibly State v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:36 am
Houston First American Savings v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 9:59 pm
If so, you may recall an article covering AT&T v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:42 pm
Similar blog posts: West Virginia Supreme Court Finds State Nursing Home Law Preempted by Federal Arbitration Act - Brown v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:49 pm
This law provides an exception to the general rule that the person who creates a work is the legal author of that work; according to copyright law in the United States, a work “made for hire” is legally owned by the employer, and not the employee. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:52 am
The Kat brings news of the decision of the Court of Appeal (Sir Robin Jacob providing a judgment with which Ward and Patten LJJ agreed) in the latest round of the Schütz v Werit dispute ([2011] EWCA Civ 927) – this time on the interpretation of s68 PA 1977. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
Congress did not sweep away all state-created defenses to contract; however; quite the contrary, Congress inserted a savings clause that arbitration provisions could be stricken just as any other contract could, “upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:29 am
Furthermore, Social Security's medical-vocational guidelines (which were found to be constitutional in Heckler v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am
Had they done so, Her Ladyship stated that she would have agreed with the minority decision in that case. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 7:12 pm
The decision of First Department, in King v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 10:29 pm
Gaines [Picked by Brendan V. [read post]
