Search for: "State v. Whited"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 13,256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2013, 6:48 pm
States may have different rules regarding electronic K-1s, so funds should check with their counsel or service providers whether they may still be required to send state K-1s on paper. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 6:34 pm
You might have thought the case, United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:35 am
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:47 am
Great British Teddy Bear Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 12:47 pm
See, e.g., Carras v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:38 am
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:25 pm
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:17 am
White Oak Corp. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 2:13 pm
The court concluded that Creativity is not a religion, but merely a secular belief system based on an isolated teaching: the promotion of the White Race.In Mootry v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 11:50 am
This case came out about a month ago, but I think it's worth noting.United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:03 am
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 4:02 am
USPTO Drops Idea of Moving Up Deadline for First Filing of Section 8 Declarations of UseThe TTAB Issued 42 Precedential Decisions in 2012Supreme Court Affirms Dismissal of Already v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 1:42 pm
The Appeals Court says, "The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, predicting that, under the circumstances presented, the Arkansas Supreme Court would not recognize a cause of action against a third party for attorney's fees incurred in separate litigation. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
This is why, for example, testing a defendant’s white powder to see whether it is cocaine invades no reasonable expectation of privacy, under United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 1:28 pm
'If an agency acts as if a document issued at headquarters is controlling in the field, if it treats the document in the same manner as it treats a legislative rule, if it bases enforcement actions on the policies or interpretations formulated in the document, if it leads private parties or State permitting authorities to believe that it will declare permits invalid unless they comply with the terms of the document, then the agency's document is for all practical purposes… [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
The office is referring the results to the state Attorney General's office. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 7:59 am
It's A 10, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 8:38 am
FERRIER, Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
Edward White, author of Creating the National Pastime [read post]
