Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 8381 - 8400 of 14,274
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2020, 11:29 am by Léon Dijkman
It can be inferred from the decision that the CJEU agrees, stating as it does that application will require an "exceptional case" [par. 75]. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:40 am by John Jascob
Noble issued the preliminary injunction based on a “plausible” Revlon breach, even though the C&J board was not conflicted and had enough deal information; the vice chancellor also certified the case for interlocutory appeal to the state supreme court.Particularly strong. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm by Cindy Cohn and rainey Reitman
The key law relied upon in the case, the Alien Tort Statute, requires, after a 2013 Supreme Court decision called Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum, that plaintiffs show that the matter “touch and concern” the United States in order for the case to proceed here. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:18 am by John Jascob
Certain alleged failures to impeach or cross-examine witnesses did not overcome the strong presumption that counsel provided reasonable professional assistance. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:11 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
The Ninth Circuit uses the extrinsic/intrinsic test created in the Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am by Richard A. Epstein
  From this caldron emerged the famous Footnote 4 in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:21 am by Mark Walsh
– a strong indication that the Court was about to rule for the Hornes. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 1:39 pm
Monitoring the Government's Response to Human Rights Judgments: Annual Report 2008"Prisoners' voting rights (Hirst v UK)47. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 1:37 pm by Tony Toranto and Nathan Barbara
The SMMI focuses on detecting greenhouse gases, toxic air contaminants, and criteria pollutants, with a strong emphasis on community involvement. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:25 pm by John Stigi
  The Court examined the impact of the United States Supreme Court’s intervening decision in Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]