Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 16,401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2015, 12:52 pm
In Fire and Police Pension Association of Colorado v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 12:30 pm
The argument relies on Offutt v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 9:07 am
Circuit’s recent opinion in PomWonderful, LLC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 6:31 am
Supreme Court issued its decision in Ricci v DeStefano, ruling that “before an employer can engage in intentional discrimination for the asserted purpose of avoiding or remedying an unintentional disparate impact, the employer must have a strong basis in evidence to believe it will be subject to disparate-impact liability if it fails to take the race-conscious, discriminatory action. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:57 am
Both Lord Kerr and Lady Hale gave strong dissenting judgments. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Best, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Justice (Rev 1) [2015] EWCA Civ 17 The Court of Appeal considered the clash of s.144 LASPO and the rules on adverse possession, on appeal from the Administrative Court. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
I mean, Europe is very strong on these things, and doing a lot of investigations into Google and Facebook and other companies. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 6:38 am
State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
The Supreme Court in Heckler v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 3:03 am
And as the Supreme Court pointed out in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:52 pm
Even then, it will need strong judicial leadership to find a satisfactory path through this thicket and to ensure that the article 8 rights of individuals are still adequately weighed in the balance. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:27 pm
In its opinion (covered in the Securities Regulation Daily Wrap Up for October 2, 2014), the panel stated that the plaintiffs failed adequately to allege facts giving rise to a strong inference of scienter. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 2:25 pm
The case, Ruusunen v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:07 pm
In Fire and Police Pension Association of Colorado v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
Chemerinsky notes in the cert petition that 9th Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski wrote in his dissent from denial of en banc review in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
The State’s suggestion, p. 18 pf the reply brief, that the statement’s “primary purpose” is not prosecutorial because it was informal should be rejected on grounds already indicated in Davis v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
The State’s suggestion, p. 18 pf the reply brief, that the statement’s “primary purpose” is not prosecutorial because it was informal should be rejected on grounds already indicated in Davis v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 9:21 am
Our Orange County employment lawyers understand here again, there is evidence to suggest the workers may have a strong case. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 7:18 am
The employee’s retaliation, due process, and multiple state law claims also survived summary judgment (Bostwick v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:47 am
In Helferich Patent Licensing v. [read post]
