Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 8381 - 8400
of 21,967
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2010, 7:02 am
In Lewis, eight African-Americans in Chicago, representing a class of more than 5,000 African-American applicants who passed a 1995 entry-level test for firefighters, but were never selected, contend that a flawed employment test becomes an act of discrimination not when the results are announced, but when actual hiring decisions are made based on test results. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:44 am
Such variable standards, Wal-Mart argues, will encourage forum shopping by opportunistic plaintiffs. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
The plaintiffs' claims include negligent supervision, defamation, emotional distress, and, more amusingly, breach of contract. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 4:16 pm
As for the trade dress claim, a plaintiff must demonstrate that (1) the trade dress is nonfunctional, (2) the trade dress has acquired secondary meaning, and (3) there is a substantial likelihood of confusion between the plaintiff’s and defendant’s products. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 12:25 pm
Regents of University of California, a lawsuit arguing that standardized test scores were racially biased against them and that reliance on standardized test scores was itself discriminatory. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 8:16 am
The EMO can also affect the admissibility of testing evidence. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 8:16 am
In addition, the EMO shall include reasonable terms for all of the following: Access to the property; Investigation and environmental testing; Sampling and testing protocols; and Specific time frames within which to conduct such testing and sampling. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 3:21 pm
This time, Plaintiffs’ class action bar appears to be testing the waters under Illinois’ Genetic Information Privacy Act, 410 Ill. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 10:15 am
Whether that test was a math test in school, an eye exam, a hearing test, or even a driving test. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:41 am
In the instant case, the Court finds that the plaintiffs' claims regarding the mother's obstetric care and treatment, the performance of certain tests and the taking of a proper history involve medical judgment and fall under medical malpractice. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 1:02 pm
While it may seem obvious that the business policy would automatically cover an accident in the business vehicle, the Court of Appeals explained the proper test in cases like these is which uninsured motorist policy is “more closely identified with” the plaintiff. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:11 pm
In the alternative, the plaintiff said the defendant Nguyen had not met the test to permit withdrawal of the admission. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 9:34 am
Several months later, that subordinate was removed from plaintiff’s job sites and was transferred to work at testing sites that required him to travel 3 to 4 hours daily. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 10:25 am
The defendant radiologist reviewed the test results and observed nodular densities in the lower lobe of the plaintiff’s right lung. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 2:17 pm
In turn, however, the plaintiff provided an affirmation of an expert in emergency medicine that opined that the defendants neglected to abide by the standard of care due to the failure to administer certain drugs and perform specific tests on the plaintiff’s decedent when he visited the emergency room. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:11 pm
In the alternative, the plaintiff said the defendant Nguyen had not met the test to permit withdrawal of the admission. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 12:25 pm
Furthermore, unwarranted deductions of fact in a complaint are not admitted as true for the purpose of testing the sufficiency of the allegations. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:31 am
The trial court awarded the plaintiff damages in excess of $180,000. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:31 am
Specifically, the defendants’ expert affidavits stated that further testing or a referral to an otolaryngologist was not indicated by the results of the plaintiff’s physical examination or the symptoms she described. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:06 am
The court looked at whether the theory or technique presented: Can be tested; Is peer-reviewed; Has a known or potential error rate; Is generally accepted by the scientific community. [read post]
