Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 8381 - 8400 of 21,967
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2016, 11:33 am by Steven Cohen
 Also, she evaluated Wagoner over a two day period, reviewed his prior school tests and evaluations, and administered various tests. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 11:31 am by Carabin & Shaw, P.C.
A doctor also testified at trial and, based on the tests he performed, noted that the plaintiff wasn’t exaggerating. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 11:31 am by Carabin & Shaw, P.C.
A doctor also testified at trial and, based on the tests he performed, noted that the plaintiff wasn’t exaggerating. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 11:29 am by Carabin & Shaw, P.C.
The defendant’s expert provided an opinion that the epidural steroid injections and chiropractic visits (beyond six of them) were unreasonable, since there was no testing confirming that the plaintiff had suffered from radiculopathy. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 11:29 am by Carabin & Shaw, P.C.
The defendant’s expert provided an opinion that the epidural steroid injections and chiropractic visits (beyond six of them) were unreasonable, since there was no testing confirming that the plaintiff had suffered from radiculopathy. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
March 9), the Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed a trial court's granting of a defendant's motion for a protective order prohibiting the presence of third-party observers during the standardized test portion of a neuropsychological evaluation.Following a motor vehicle accident that gave rise to this case, the plaintiff treated with a neuropsychologist and, during that treatment, the plaintiff's treating neuropsychologist employed standa [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 10:26 am by Eric Beasley
 A recent case before the Tennessee Court of Appeals applies this test in considering a negligence claim from a teenage plaintiff who fell while at summer school. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 10:26 am by Eric Beasley
 A recent case before the Tennessee Court of Appeals applies this test in considering a negligence claim from a teenage plaintiff who fell while at summer school. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 2:04 pm by Heather Cobun
A Baltimore jury awarded $3 million Friday to a woman who suffered permanent brain damage from exposure to lead paint as a child despite the plaintiff’s inability to get access to the property to conduct testing. [read post]
  Mercedes Defeats “Cheat Device” Claims A New Jersey federal judge found that car owners lack standing to bring a suit against Mercedes alleging that their diesel cars use “cheat devices” to cheat on emissions tests. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:28 am by Sharifi Firm, PLC
In this opinion, the court emphasized the balancing test of the foreseeability of harm against the burden imposed on a proprietor to protect against potential harm. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 10:50 am by Steven Cohen
Plaintiff was diagnosed with a form of asthma which was allegedly tied to work he did for the defendant. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 10:38 am by Arfaa Law Group
Essentially, the plaintiff must show that a prudent OBGYN would have conducted genetic testing in the same situation. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:00 am by Thomas Musmann
X ZR 149/12 (“vehicle steel component”) This decision renders more precise the test for establishing an entitlement to a patent. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:12 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
The general rule in Florida is that a plaintiff may recover medical bills for any diagnostic testing that is reasonably necessary to figure out whether the accident caused an injury. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 2:24 pm
Le test pour déterminer son existence découle de la jurisprudence Biakanja. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 8:22 pm by Caesar and Napoli, P.C.
“Uber’s arbitration appeal at the 2nd Circuit is big test for Internet business. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 8:22 pm by Caesar and Napoli, P.C.
“Uber’s arbitration appeal at the 2nd Circuit is big test for Internet business. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 6:24 am by INFORRM
Ultimately, the question rests on whether the public interest in the harm suffered, or likely to be suffered, by the plaintiff is sufficiently serious that it outweighs the public interest in protecting expression. [read post]