Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc."
Results 8381 - 8400
of 8,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2008, 12:16 pm
Nelson v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
United States Polo Ass'n, Inc., No. 06-3691 (2d Cir. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Consumer Cause, Inc. (2002) 29 Cal.4th 53, 57.) [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:42 pm
Oreck Direct, LLC v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
: (Spicy IP),Recent trends in IP strategy – an excerpt from London talk: (IP ThinkTank),World Customs Organisation recommends far-reaching new rules on IP: (Intellectual Property Watch),Members seek ways to move policy in WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee: (Intellectual Property Watch)Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsXerox – avoiding genericide: (Afro-IP),Big business urges adoption of Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty: (IP Justice),WIPO press release ‘Record… [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:39 am
" 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 8:06 pm
”The case cite is Commission v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:08 am
See Swann v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 12:14 pm
Clinton’s comment isn’t going to turn a protectable trademark into a generic one, it must be giving Xerox’s branding people fits.The Illinois Business Law Journal reports this sort of thing is what Google Inc. has been trying to avoid. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:24 am
FEIT AND LAUREN T. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:19 pm
Colonial Refuse Serv., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:40 pm
In LaRue v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
In a crushing blow to consumers, on Thursday, February 21st, the United States Supreme Court again sided with big pharmaceutical medical device makers. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:17 pm
Background of trademark law Passed by Congress in 1946, the Lanham Act is the source of all Federal trademark law in the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 6:14 pm
United Airlines (9th Cir. 1999) 166 F.3d 1272, 1278; Garibaldi v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 7:43 pm
Ag Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 8:29 am
" Buckman Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 4:30 am
The original complaint alleged Illinois state law causes of action and defined the proposed class as “all persons in the United States who purchased Hasbro Inc. [read post]
