Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 8381 - 8400 of 14,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2014, 2:32 pm by Marta Requejo
They reiterate that for a case to be given jurisdiction by ATS it must a) touch and concern the United States with sufficient force to displace the presumption against extraterritoriality and: b) demonstrate that the conduct, prima facie, breaches a law of nations or treaty of the United States. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:00 pm by Kevin
There is a case entitled United States v. 50,000 Cardboard Boxes, More or Less, Each Containing One Pair of Clacker Balls. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 9:03 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit stated "We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment to [Schreiber]. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:00 am
N.Y.; Doubleday, 1977)In 2000, as was her custom, United States Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day-O'Connor spent election night at a party. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 8:09 am by FDABlog HPM
FDA, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, June 22, 2010 (“Complaint”). [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:34 am
Hence the Contracts Clause of Article V of the Constitution, which prohibited states from interfering with the obligation to pay debts. [read post]
9 May 2017, 11:48 am by Patricia Salkin
State of Ohio v City of Middletown, 2017 WL 1857271 (6th Cir CA 5/8/2017)  Filed under: Due Process, Equal Protection, Rezoning, Takings [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:34 am
Hence the Contracts Clause of Article V of the Constitution, which prohibited states from interfering with the obligation to pay debts. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
This question—and the case behind it, McCreary County v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am by Mark Walsh
United States, which limits the scope of identity theft under a federal criminal statute. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am by Jacques Singer-Emery
Finally, the doctrinal reason for not having the military commission review these two additional violations is found in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:44 am by Andrew Frisch
United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352 (11th Cir.1982) (“Recognizing that there are often great inequalities in bargaining power between employers and employees, Congress made the FLSA’s provisions mandatory. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:44 am by Andrew Frisch
United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352 (11th Cir.1982) (“Recognizing that there are often great inequalities in bargaining power between employers and employees, Congress made the FLSA’s provisions mandatory. [read post]