Search for: "v. "
Results 8381 - 8400
of 493,698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2008, 5:42 pm
Korean Licensing & Royalty Law Updates One Korean Company in 2013 BrandZ Top 100: Samsung Amendment to Korea’s Intellectual Property Registration System: Korea IP Law Updates Filing for a Patent in Korea: Basics of Korean Patent Law “Samsung’s First Family Struggles to Keep Grip on Company” Report by Bloomberg The post Spansion v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:00 am
If you want to read the decision it's posted on the Supreme Court Website - McDonald v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 10:31 am
R (Shields) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWHC 3102 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 398 “The Secretary of State for Justice had power to consider exercising the royal prerogative of mercy to grant a free pardon in respect of a person convicted and sentenced by a foreign court but transferred to the United Kingdom to [...] [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:58 am
British Broadcasting Corporation v Sugar and Another House of Lords “The British Broadcasting Corporation was a public authority for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 which meant that all requests for information were subject to the jurisdiction of the Information Commissioner and, on appeal, the Information Tribunal, even if the information requested was held [...] [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 1:14 am
Regina (Wood) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis Court of Appeal “Justification for state interference with the right to privacy had to be the more compelling where that interference was in pursuit of the protection of the community from the risk of public disorder or low level crime as against the danger of terrorism or really [...] [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:06 am
Khan v United Kingdom European Court of Human Rights “The deportation of a Pakistani national who had lived in the United Kingdom since the age of three would be a breach of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, guaranteeing the right to a family life. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:26 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: CRIMINAL – MUNICIPAL COURT DA 14-0511, 2016 MT 63, CITY OF KALISPELL, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 7:16 am
The Square Deal Furniture Company* Deborah Waire Post Every time I teach Williams v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:03 pm
Today the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Walden v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 7:56 am
As expected from the oral argument in April, the Court's opinion today in IMS v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 12:00 am
Daniel Sokol Giovanni Immordino (Salerno) and Michele Polo (Bocconi) conceptualize Optimal Legal Standards in Antitrust: Traditional v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm
Yesterday the Supreme Court issued a five-page per curiam opinion in Nitro-Lift Technologies L.L.C. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:49 am
R (Tait) v Criminal Injuries Compensation Appeals Panel [2009] EWHC 767 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 138 “As a matter of construction of para 11 of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme 2001, a finding that it was not the motive of a driver in using his vehicle to inflict or attempt to inflict injury on any person [...] [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:55 am
Matalan Retail Ltd v Commissioners of Revenue and Customs Chancery Division “Where, for duty purposes, a classification was allocated to imported swimwear but that was then revised and corrected, the VAT and Duties Tribunal and Revenue and Customs Commissioners were not precluded by the doctrines of estoppel or abuse of process from retaining the monetary difference between [...] [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 1:49 am
Eweida v British Airways plc Court of Appeal “Because it was not a requirement of Christianity that adherents had to wear a public display of their faith, it was not indirect discrimination for an employer’s dress code to prevent a staff member from wearing a cross as a visible neck adornment. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:59 am
Will the Supreme Court’s ruling last week in AT&T v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:41 am
Yesterday I posted about the unveiling of a monument to Euclid v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:00 am
Romano Subiotto QC and Jacopo Figus Diaz explore Lundbeck v Commission: Reverse Payment Patent Settlements as Restrictions of Competition by Object. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 6:00 pm
Baker recently published an Article entitled, Rachal v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:18 pm
The Texas Supreme Court issued its opinion today in Severance v. [read post]
