Search for: "Beare v. State"
Results 8401 - 8420
of 15,029
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2013, 3:43 pm
Birmingham City Council v Balog [2013] EWCA Civ 1582A s.202 review decision on affordability was at the centre of this second appeal, brought by Birmingham after a s.204 appeal decision went against them. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:47 am
Jack Taylor v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 10:15 am
United States). [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:40 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:48 am
On appeal, York Capital argued that the Second Circuit’s test set out in Coppola v Bear Stearns & Co for determining whether a creditor is an employer within the meaning of the WARN Act should be applied. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:19 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So concludes today’s Silvester v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:12 pm
Hutchison v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:23 am
The respondent, on the costs question, says that this is a case for an order that each party bear their own costs, consistent with Olney v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:13 am
Cooper, in his November 29, 2013 opinion in Travis v. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 11:14 am
Alas, it bears little relation to what happens day to day in our courts. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:06 pm
The cases are EPA v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:42 pm
Banks want to maximize profits by charging interest rates as high as the market (customers) will bear. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:50 am
Seuss Enterprises, LP v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 10:02 am
And indeed the logic of United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 7:57 am
” In yet another AEDPA case, White v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
” A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm
The Department’s anti-commodification argument is also at odds with the fact that every other party in the transfer of PBSCs from provider to recipient is compensated financially for her role in that transaction — except the one who bears the physical costs. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
