Search for: "Fair v. State"
Results 8401 - 8420
of 27,426
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2007, 5:21 am
Oral arguments in the case of City of Carmel v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 1:33 pm
Justice Valihura stated that the Board had “acted” in the following ways: (i) meeting with legal counsel and hiring an independent adviser to assist directors in determining fair market value; (ii) meeting with its financial adviser and reviewing a valuation analysis; and (iii) adopting a resolution of the Board. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
” * Turo v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 10:24 am
Fair enough. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 10:12 am
In Ling Nan Zheng v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
The State still denied benefits. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
In Reed v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 9:08 am
Sellers v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
For The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at Husted v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 7:21 am
Moses v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:44 pm
Oral complaints are protected: In yesterday’s Kasten v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 10:04 am
Jordan v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
In Desnousse v LB Newham [2006] EWCA Civ 547; [2006] QB 831; [2006] HLR 38, it was held that Manek was still binding, notwithstanding the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998 and, in particular, the rights protected under art 6 (right to a fair trial) and art.8 (right to respect for home). [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:19 am
It is fair to sat this Bill is controversial with strong views being expressed by both critics and supporters of the Bill. [read post]
11 May 2012, 11:42 am
In particular, it nicely synthesizes the current state of the case law among those circuits that apply the presumption, and explains exactly how, under its synthesis, a stock drop case needs to be analyzed. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 9:14 am
The Court cited evidence that space rents were at 20 percent of fair market and mobile homes were selling at huge premiums because of rent control. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:08 pm
This is only tangentially related to the usual topics of this blog, but given the first sentence in the Ninth Circuit's opinion in Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 1:36 pm
By Leta Seletzky: In Seagull Energy E & P, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
On July 20, 2012, the Alabama Supreme Court released its opinion in Ex parte Caldwell (In re: West Fraser, Inc. v. [read post]
