Search for: "Head v State" Results 8401 - 8420 of 14,392
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2013, 8:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Circuit issued an order in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Sir Tim Berners Lee said in the early days of the Web: “The first amendment to the Constitution of the United States … addresses the right to speak. [read post]
3 May 2013, 11:16 am by Ritika Singh
Interestingly, the Volokh Conspiracy notes that the New York Supreme Court held today in Bezio v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:25 pm by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 11:00 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  This question is very much on our minds these days after the GPS case from last term — United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:29 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)The alleged altering and commercial exploitation of a nine-year-old photo of a then-teen with Down Syndrome that went viral on the Internet prompted the 26-year-old man and his parents last week to file an $18 million suit in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, according to reports by the Associated Press and the NashvilleCityPaper.com Web site.Holland et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 1:26 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 4:43 am by Broc Romanek
District Court for the Southern District of New York found that the 2010 amendment to Rule 14a-8(i)(8) did not change its original holding in Lucian Bebchuk v Electronic Arts. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
As reported by the Inquirer, a state appeals court “upheld the proposition that German privacy laws don’t apply to Facebook, and ruled that the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ULD) for the German state of Schleswig-Holstein has to accept that“. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 10:39 pm by Shouvik Kumar Guha
T-Series’ arguments against both these provisions can be classified under the two broad headings of natural justice and unconstitutionality (being violative of Arts. 14, 19(1)(g), 21, and 300A). [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
Reciting Seager v Copydex and Banks v EMI Songs, the former judge stated that 'where an inventor wanted to sell his idea for money, money is what he got'. [read post]