Search for: "J. C." Results 8401 - 8420 of 19,483
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2014, 2:35 am
Alberto BellanSome may think that the past few weeks have been fairly intense for internet service providers (ISPs) in the UK alone, with Arnold J clarifying, first, that blocking orders can be issued against websites that advertise and sell counterfeit goods [here] and, then, issuing the biggest blocking order to date in this country [here]. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Jason M. Halper
Ultimately, however, C&J shareholders were exchanging 100% ownership of C&J for 47% control in the post-merger entity. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:48 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
” Tattletales Embraced as Whistle-Blower Programs Gain Support By Peter J. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 6:56 am by Lawrence Kasperek
The 4th Department agreed with defendant that County Court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 210.20 (1) (c) because he was denied his right to testify before the grand jury. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 1:08 am
Before examining in depth the patent at issue and its validity, Birrs J addressed some preliminary, yet admittedly irrelevant, questions. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:51 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Kiley Introducing Funding Liquidity Risk in a Macro Stress-Testing Framework by Céline Gauthier, Moez Souissi and Xuezhi Liu The Role of Counterparty Risk in CHAPS Following the Collapse of Lehman Brothers by Evangelos Benos, Rodney J. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm by Jag
  (It should however be noted that in the more recent case of C & J v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (2012)  the High Court explicitly applied the principles of S & Marper to the retention of photographs taken by police on arrest of the claimants, as both types of information contain “external identification features”[33].) [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm by Jag
  (It should however be noted that in the more recent case of C & J v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (2012)  the High Court explicitly applied the principles of S & Marper to the retention of photographs taken by police on arrest of the claimants, as both types of information contain “external identification features”[33].) [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am by Legal Beagle
id=a5cdb7a6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7OUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2014] CSOH 169 CA73/13OPINION OF LORD DOHERTY In the cause (FIRST) A LIMITED (SECOND) B LIMITED (THIRD) C LIMITED (FOURTH) D LIMITED (FIFTH) E LIMITED Pursuers;against F Defender:Pursuers:  Sandison QC, Watt;  Shepherd & WedderburnDefender:  Party Litigant27 November 2014Introduction[1]        The defender was employed by the fifth pursuer between 1 September 2003 and 8… [read post]