Search for: "John Does 5" Results 8401 - 8420 of 8,657
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2007, 3:50 pm
Here's more from the column:"[Cheney's chief of staff and counsel, David] Addington does not cite any authority or language for his new claim that the Vice President is not an 'agency.' In fact, there is none. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 1:21 pm
"But if I'm not mistaken, the Chief Justice voted for the more conservative result (by most observers' lights) in 24 out of the 24 cases decided by a 5-4 vote. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 9:53 am
The current case involved two inmates convicted of sex crimes — Frank Edward Johnson and John William Henderson. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:21 am
Cheney claims that distinction does not extend National Archives oversight to his office. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 8:38 am
Chief Justice John Roberts said it was reasonable for the principal 'to conclude the banner promoted illegal drug use - in violation of established school policy - and that failing to act would send a powerful message to the students in her charge.' Dissenter John Paul Stevens called the bong hits sign a "nonsense banner" and said 'the court does serious violence to the 1st Amendment in upholding - indeed, lauding - a school's decision to… [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 7:59 am
"The First Amendment does not require schools to tolerate at school events student expression that contributes to [the dangers of drug abuse]," wrote Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:37 pm
The fourth ruling, written by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:12 pm
  Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger     5. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:26 am
His opinion was joined by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:10 am
Apr. 9, 1999); In re Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation, 1996 WL 107556, at *3-5 (E.D. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 6:36 am
This does not mean that a defendant's race did not influence individual jurors. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 11:36 am
NFP civil opinions today (5): Rolando and Jacquelyn Curington v. [read post]