Search for: "M. B.1."
Results 8401 - 8420
of 13,699
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2018, 5:30 am
M. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 1:02 pm
Whatever on God’s green earth they think “it” is – I’m already admitted in the Ninth Circuit, and I don’t think much of it. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 12:07 pm
Raoult’s intemperate and inappropriate personal attacks on Bik have led several hundred scientists to sign an open letter in support of Bik.[7] This scientist doth protest too much, methinks. [1] George Andrew Olah Nobel Prize Speech (1994) (quoting from George Von Békésy, Experiments in Hearing 8 (1960). [2] Elisabeth M. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 7:07 am
1 I knew the answer. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 3:33 am
The Quebec Research Centre of Private and Comparative Law invites applications for three postgraduate scholarship opportunities.1. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 10:30 am
Since this is a cybercrime blog, I'm going to use criminal examples. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 10:08 am
In a matter of 24 or 48 hours following notifications, the European Commission has already adopted several decisions under the legal bases mentioned above: on 12 March 2020, a €12 m Danish scheme to compensate damages caused by cancellations of large public events due to COVID-19 outbreak; on 21 March 2020, a Danish €130 million aid scheme to support small businesses and three French aid schemes State guarantees on commercial loans and credit lines to companies that have up to… [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 8:22 am
They don't all point in the same direction. 1. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 1:08 am
B. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 12:32 pm
" Therefore, the father has a right under the common law and section 1014.04(1)(b) to rely upon his moral or religious beliefs to direct his child's upbringing. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Lucy M. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
To wit: despite that public religion discourse surrounding abortion, the Dobbs Court analysis took religionas so marginal to its analysis that the term, on its own, never actually appears in its opinions.[14]Rather, the question I’m concerned with here is whether or how we might think about doctrines (especially with the questions placed on stare decisis) that might better recognize a diversity of opinions even if one reigns supreme, while ensuring the rule of law. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
Sure, I'm busy. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
Def: I'm not saying you're stupid or anything. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 8:06 am
Taking evidence or statements from persons;b. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:02 pm
And now is an excellent time to do so because a number of important changes to the law are set to take effect on July 1, 2013.I’ll address the five changes that I think are among the most important below, but be advised that I’m only scratching the surface. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
S&M cases are fascinating in thinking about consent and criminality. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 12:59 pm
(The OECD norm is about 3%, as compared to, in the US, 2% pre-TCJA and 1% post-TCJA.) [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:52 pm
Since Booker has knocked out 3553(b), though, doesn’t it make some sense to look back to what the legislation was trying to accomplish before 3553(b) was added? [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 12:38 am
Preservation of family businesses;m. [read post]
