Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 8401 - 8420
of 13,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2010, 12:15 pm
Walton v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
GARLAND GEORGE CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Unopposed motion for continuance of resentencing hearing pending review in United States Supreme Court of decision of United States Court of Appeals which obligates trial court to impose 30-year sentence rather than 17-and-a-half-year sentence initially imposed for offense of production of child pornography for transportation into this country -- Motion granted -- Response to… [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:07 am
Based on the January 2, 2024, filing in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 8:27 am
 Check the Kucana v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:11 am
Skinner petitioned the United States Supreme Court seeking further review, and that request was granted by today's order.Our office responded to Mr. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm
§§ 1481 and 1484, which require true and accurate information on invoices and entry documents.Government lawyers allege in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 10:37 pm
Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, who has been presiding over Apple v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 3:43 am
DurantLeah V. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 10:30 am
The TMA clears the path for legitimate businesses to register their marks by cleaning out the federal trademark register and giving the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) the ability to expedite the registration process. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:35 am
Too bogus to fool the IRS, but real enough for conviction -- Murphy’s law is alive and well.United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 7:57 am
Women in the United States face alarmingly high levels of gender-based harassment and violence. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 10:05 am
In 2002, in Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS In re: NASHEL : : : : : Jose J. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:29 pm
United States and Black v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:09 am
Despite U.S. court’s dismissal of these cases, that the United States tortured and abused many men in pursuit of its so-called “war on terror” is not in dispute. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm
Two of those decisions, Brown v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 6:28 am
As this language came directly from United States Supreme Court precedent, see Olmstead v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
" State of Indiana v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 3:55 pm
Instead, the justices agreed to decide only the first question presented by the states’ petition: whether states with an interest in the dispute should be allowed to intervene to defend a rule when the United States is no longer doing so. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:08 pm
In Ryabyshchuk v. [read post]
