Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General" Results 8401 - 8420 of 14,178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2015, 9:19 am by Eric S. Solotoff
There is finally a case that you can cite to that stands for this proposition – specifically, Zeitlin v. [read post]
  And, in the wake of the Dental Examiners decision, the State Bar immediately sponsored legislation to require the North Carolina Attorney General to act as its “supervisor. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:55 am
 The IPKat and Merpel know that it's neither binding nor methodologically perfect, but it's the best they can do with their limited resources and it does give some indication of how people regard the event [for an explanation of the issues, read Darren's Katpost here and, to find the poll, click here and look in the general area of the top left hand corner of your screen].An event reminder. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
On January 3, 2013, the Washtenaw County Prosecuting Attorney declined to prosecute. . . . [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:45 am by Steven Eversole
Additional Resources: Police: DUI suspect had 13 cans of whipped cream in SUV, May 28, 2015, The Tennessean More Blog Entries: Marks v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:45 am by Steven Eversole
Additional Resources: Police: DUI suspect had 13 cans of whipped cream in SUV, May 28, 2015, The Tennessean More Blog Entries: Marks v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 10:41 am by Richard S. Zackin
For answers to any questions regarding this blog, or with regard to religious accommodation issues generally, please feel free to contact an attorney in the Gibbons Employment & Labor Law Department. [read post]
  The Ohio Attorney General’s office issued a similar subpoena to AMC seeking to investigate potential violations by the company of Ohio’s antitrust laws. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:05 am by John Lewis
Supreme Court declined to hear a case challenging a California Supreme Court holding that the state’s Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) could not be waived in a mandatory arbitration agreement. [read post]