Search for: "Robert Thomas" Results 8401 - 8420 of 10,845
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2010, 11:02 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
But Scalia wouldn’t let go and enlisted Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito in support of his cause: "States effect a taking if they recharacterize as public property what was previously private property. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Jennifer S. Taub
" Supreme Court:In the majority opinion, written by Justice Scalia and joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas and Alito, the Court had to split hairs in order to force Mr. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 4:10 am by Jeff Foust
On Monday Congressman Robert Aderholt (R-AL) announced plans to introduce legislation that would compel NASA to spend FY10 funds on Constellation. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:00 am by LindaMBeale
The opinion of the Court was written by Justice Kennedy and joined by the four justices on the right--Alito, Roberts, Thomas and Scalia. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:33 am by Rumpole
We don't know about Justices Alito, Scalia, Thomas, Kennedy, and Roberts, but we haven't seen our local Militia marching down the street lately. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:10 pm by Gene Quinn
What we do know, however, is that 5 Justices, namely Justices Kennedy, Roberts, Thomas, Alito and Scalia all agreed that business methods are patentable subject matter. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm by Joe Mullin
The Court’s liberal wing—Stevens, along with justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Sonia Stotomayor—favored a ban on business method patents; the conservatives—Chief Justice John Roberts, joined by justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas—joined the moderate, and frequent swing voter, Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wanted to leave open the possibility of patent grants on business methods. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:35 pm by carie
District Court Judge Robert Echols issued a temporary restraining order blocking his autopsy. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:45 pm
  If this holding strikes you as both consistent with the Federal Arbitration Act’s goal of promoting arbitration of private disputes as well as precise reading of plain language of the law, then you share the majority view of Justices Scalia, Alito, Kennedy, Roberts, and Thomas. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
Justice Kennedy was joined by Justices Roberts, Thomas and Alito in full. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:27 am by Jon
A page of discussion and links is here.Among the majority, 4, Alito, Roberts, Scalia, and Kennedy, decided only on the basis of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:19 am by Sheppard Mullin
Writing for the majority, Justice Kennedy (joined in full by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas and Alito, and in part by Justice Scalia), held that the Federal Circuit's "machine-or-transformation" test is not the sole test for deciding whether an invention is a patent-eligible process. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:39 am by Lawrence Solum
Justice Thomas's argument was based on his understanding of the original meaning of the 14th Amendment; Justice Thomas's understanding of the history appears to be heavily influence by the work Professor Kurt Lash, who joins the faculty of the University of Illinois College of Law this summer. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:55 am by Michael Risch
Limiting patentable processes to only those that use a machine or transform matter is a useful test but is not the only test. (5 Justices - Kennedy, Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito)C. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:52 am by Pace Law Library
City of New London [videorecording] : 545 U.S. 469 (2005) / produced by Thomas Metzloff, Sarah Wood, Todd ShoemakerLucas v. [read post]