Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 8401 - 8420
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2013, 1:10 am
Widely unnoticed by the public, a fight between Apple and Samsung in two venues -- the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States District Court for the Northern District of California -- over the proper way forward for their first U.S. federal litigation is ecalating. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:06 pm
(LA Neighbors United v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:59 am
Cabell v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:19 am
Target sold 140 Bruce Lee t-shirts in California, while Urban Outfitters sold 4,980 shirts California and elsewhere in the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am
United States (2012) 133 S.Ct. 511, in which the Supreme Court rejected an argument that temporarily flooding someone's property cannot qualify as a taking, as a matter of law. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:18 pm
In 2011, the California Supreme Court held in Pineda v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:08 pm
Last year it produced a terrific 9th Circuit opinion reinforcing that only the United States, not private plaintiffs, can enforce the FDCA and FDA regulations. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:22 pm
Portfolio Recovery Associates, a Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) opinion from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
Co. (1933, Mont.) 26 P2d 175 [periodic immersion of injured hand into hot water]; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (1919 Neb.) 173 NW 689 [x-ray procedure requiring injection of contrast substance into the kidney]; Cardinal v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 10:46 am
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:09 am
But that usage of "blessing" has constitutional text to support it: We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquillity, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Goldstein v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 9:28 pm
A group of California vineyard operators will be represented in the case of Horne v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 1:52 pm
Judge Ronald Whyte, Senior United States District Judge, Northern District of California Litigants were Scientology/critic; at each other’s throats, which explains some of the litigation issues raised. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 1:39 pm
— United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 9:54 am
Among other new orders, the Court issued one in the other pending same-sex marriage case — United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 12:27 pm
Brehm received another favorable trial judgment, this time against Unum Life Insurance Company – the largest group disability insurer in the United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 9:53 am
Edwards v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 6:44 am
The 78-page complaint (full text) in Newdow v. [read post]
