Search for: "State v. Light" Results 8401 - 8420 of 28,970
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2018, 7:18 am by Gene Killian
” Of course, it came to light that CGL policies were designed to cover long-term pollution related liabilities all along, as was confirmed by insurance industry representatives both in internal memoranda and in representations made to state regulators. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:27 am by Jessica Kroeze
The Opponents had raised objections on the grounds of Articles 100(a) and (b) EPC.The evidence cited during the opposition procedure includesD1: WO 2007/087243 A2;D2: WO 2004/041982 A1;D3: EP 1 867 708 A1;D4: V. [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:14 am by Joy Waltemath
The EEOC argued that the employer’s reason was pretextual, however, in light of the manager’s goal “to change the face of the department,” i.e., to change it from black to white. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:13 am by Orin Kerr
The Nebraska Supreme Court recently handed down a new Fourth Amendment decision, State v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The article comes in light of Google’s participation in the Pentagon Project Maven, which researches the application of AI to military drones. [read post]
20 May 2018, 3:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Worthington & Anor v Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd (2018) EWCA Civ 1125 The Court of Appeal on an instance of tenancy management going bad, very bad indeed. [read post]
20 May 2018, 2:13 pm
Book review: You Don’t Own Me: How Mattel v MGA Entertainment Exposed Barbie’s Dark SideThis book, written by Orly Lobel, describes the behind the scenes action of the dispute between Mattel and MGA Entertainment, i.e., Barbie v Bratz. [read post]
19 May 2018, 10:49 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"A Farmer's Branch police officer who'd never hypnotized anyone before failed to follow a number of mandatory requirements under Texas Court of Criminal Appeals jurisprudence in Zani v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:38 pm by Aurora Barnes
§ 4B1.2, is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]