Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 8401 - 8420
of 13,226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
This is because the FTC states that consumers would not switch to mass-market or true luxury handbags “in sufficient volumes to render the price increase unprofitable. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:15 pm
In Morrison v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 3:00 am
This decision is a significant follow-on to the Delaware District Court’s recent opinion in Temple Inland, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 4:00 pm
Kushner v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 1:08 pm
In Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:54 pm
Citing Higginbotham v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 12:51 pm
Wall for petitioner (Art Lien) Arguing for Apple, lawyer Daniel Wall told the justices that the iPhone users’ claim is exactly the kind of claim that is prohibited under the Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:50 pm
The lawyers also contended that the Second Circuit ruling contradicts the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:10 am
Anders, and Sabastian V. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
Barton v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:47 pm
The big case currently in the news underscoring this point is FTC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:04 am
Green v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:03 pm
In that sense, it is the government that lacks mutuality; it can indict with a reasonable assurance—[but certainly not a guarantee]—that the defendant will not be able/willing to pay the stiff price of appearing in the U.S. to challenge the indictment. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:31 pm
First State Trust Co., 883 S.W.2d 648, 649 (Tex. 1994); Heine, 835 S.W.2d at 84). [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
Greenway Ohio, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:31 pm
United States, 72 Fed. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
The case then went back to the district court for a determination of damages – but in the meantime, the Court decided the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 10:00 pm
The Plaintiffs argued the unconstitutionality of the Medicare Negotiation Program under the Fifth Amendment by relying on Michigan Bell v. [read post]
