Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 8401 - 8420
of 57,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2012, 3:50 pm
As the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 12:30 am
In California v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
Neither [United States v.] [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:01 am
The Supreme Court reaffirmed the state-action doctrine in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 9:04 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:48 pm
Brill v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:47 pm
The United States v Paul Kruse trial in Austin, TX, has adjourned for the weekend. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 6:52 am
The case is State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 8:11 pm
MILTON JACKSON V. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:45 am
This exception incorporates the New York Times v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:32 am
On 6 October 2023, the English Court of Appeal (Court of Appeal) handed down its judgment in Mints v PJSC National Bank Trust [2023] EWCA Civ 1132. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:29 pm
Yesterday's 10 Cir. decision (United States v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:13 am
Last week, the US Supreme Court issued its decision in Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Qualifications for employment in the public service mandated by statute may not be waivedMartin, as Administratrix of The Estate of Christos Lekkas v State of New York et al., 82 AD2d 712Christos Lekkas, a permanent Assistant Clinical Physician in the then Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities,* [OMRDD] was never licensed to practice medicine in New York or in any State of the United States or in the Dominion of Canada. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Qualifications for employment in the public service mandated by statute may not be waivedMartin, as Administratrix of The Estate of Christos Lekkas v State of New York et al., 82 AD2d 712Christos Lekkas, a permanent Assistant Clinical Physician in the then Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities,* [OMRDD] was never licensed to practice medicine in New York or in any State of the United States or in the Dominion of Canada. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011 – read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s Neil Sheldon appeared for the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
In State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 9:50 am
In Singh v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 12:09 pm
In DeShaney v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In the oft quoted words of Willes J in East v Holmes ((1858) 1 F&F 347, 349), “If a man wrote that all lawyers were thieves, no particular lawyer could sue him unless there was something to point to the particular individual“ In the leading English case of Knupffer v Express Newspapers ([1944] AC 116) the “Daily Express” published an article referring to “The quislings on whom Hitler flatters himself he can build a pro-German movement within… [read post]
