Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 8401 - 8420
of 16,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2022, 1:07 am
On Tuesday, there'll be an interesting Ericsson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
And only once did I imagine the parties in a case and give them faces – State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:36 am
See Cuyler v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 4:56 pm
Roe v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 1:36 am
As the court stated, reiterating Lord Justice Oliver in Anheuser-Buch v Budejovicky Budvar NP, that goodwill is very much "localized" and that "...reputation which may, no doubt, and frequently does, exist without any supporting local business… does not by itself constitute a property which the law protects". [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:53 am
In that sense the Supreme Court judgment has similarities to the Canadian Supreme Court Copyright Pentalogy and the CJEU decision in Usedsoft v Oracle.The approach articulated by Lord Sumption is the opposite of that stated by Proudman J at first instance: "The exception cannot have been intended to legitimise all copies made in the course of browsing or users would be permitted to watch pirated films and listen to pirated music." [read post]
31 May 2015, 3:47 am
As I shall have to explain, thirty years after the decision in Eisai courts of member states are still working out how to deal with the fall-out from that case. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:46 am
This dispute could become the next Microsoft v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
This rule has its genesis in the Court of Appeals decision of Riggs v Palmer, in which the Court stated “[n]o one shall be permitted to profit by his own fraud, or to take advantage of his own wrong, or to found any claim upon his own iniquity, or to acquire property by his own crime” (Riggs v Palmer, 115 NY 506, 511 [1889]). [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:00 pm
Crevor, 3 Binney 121 (1810); Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:11 pm
Ford and Acer v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:39 am
The Court's decision was based on a re-analysis of the Eleventh Circuit case of Johnson v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:20 am
See also Dopson-Troutt v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:16 pm
Truett Payne Co., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 10:36 am
See Choyce v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 3:16 am
However, the defendants argued that this law is a strong indication of the policy of this state. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
First a word about the plaintiff: Some Kat readers may recall that Pom Wonderful prevailed in a closely watched decision given by the United States Supreme Court on June 12, 2014, Pom Wonderful LLC v Coca Cola Company. [read post]
5 May 2021, 2:09 pm
[FN1] With the strong parallels with Tornillo, you might wonder why the Florida Legislature would pass a law doomed to failure, costing the state the time and expense of defending it in court. [read post]
5 May 2016, 2:26 pm
The case we always cite in California is Stangvik v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Given this taxonomy of interpretive styles, how would we characterize Justice Clarence Thomas’s opinion in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
