Search for: "T A V Holdings Inc" Results 8401 - 8420 of 12,087
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2011, 10:41 am
” The November 2, 2011, decision in Sprint Nextel Corporation v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 8:54 am by John Steele
Regarding that last point, I was disappointed by the Second Circuit's holding in GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm by Amy Howe
  The first was Freeman v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm by Michael W. Huseman
Apple retains the right to withdraw from the settlement in the event an excessive number of requests for exclusion are received.The Court will hold a hearing in this case (Johnson v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:50 am by Robert Milligan
By Robert Milligan and Joshua Salinas The best things in life are free, except for screensavers, games, and other software provided on-line that spy on your computer activity and gather your personal information, at least according to the consumer Plaintiffs in the recent data collection/privacy suit filed in Illinois federal court captioned Harris v. comScore, Inc., No. 11 C 5807, 2011 WL 4738357 (N.D. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:06 am by Marie Louise
(Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) District Court W D Washington holds trademark infringement defendant in contempt: T-Mobile v Terry (Seattle Trademark Lawyer)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Airfx.com – District Court Arizona denies motion to dismiss on reverse domain name hijacking claim: Airfx.com v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:43 pm by Patent Docs
Even Cybor (decided en banc in the days just after the Supreme Court's decision in Markman v.Westview Instruments, Inc.), holding that claim construction was a question for a... [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 9:54 am by Susan Brenner
[T]he Court accordingly holds that the Defendants' keylogger software did not intercept an electronic communication as a matter of law, and Rene's claim for interception must fail. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 12:04 pm by William McGrath
Judge Murray evaluated the conduct of the two men under the Supreme Court's recent decision in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]