Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 8401 - 8420
of 9,110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2009, 7:51 am
US v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:01 am
Wandel et al. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 3:48 am
Use immunity is used on the Federal level and in most states, and is the only type required by the 5th Amendment. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:11 am
Carolina Power & Light, 340 S.C. 438, 444, 531 S.E.2d 535, 538 (Ct.App.2000)("The level of care owed is dependent upon the class of the person present. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:27 pm
The Su Âpreme Court's decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 1:24 pm
KSR v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 1:24 pm
KSR v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:32 am
Sediment ponds usually are constructed in existing streambeds, using earth and rock to create an embankment. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 11:37 am
ACCA's web site tells us that ACCA "granted argument on whether appellant's Motion for Appointment and Funding of a Forensic Psychiatrist and Forensic Psychologist to assist in appellate review should be granted. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part II identifies significant trends in class action practice at the federal and state levels. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:19 pm
Potential issues facing Congress include the adequacy of the federal government's existing grant programs, the lack of current national-level statistics on recidivism, whether other outcome measures should be considered, whether more funding should be allocated toward program evaluations, and whether enough coordination is taking place among the various federal agencies that manage programs used to fund offender reentry. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:45 am
An article earmarking FY2010 funds raised through the 1 percent Community Preservation Act surcharge for appropriate use in the next grant cycle: 5 percent for committee administrative expenses, estimated at $12,800; 10 percent each for historical resources, community housing and open space projects, estimated at $27,000 each; and the remaining $175,500 to be reserved for future use. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 1:25 am
The seminal case on the right to privacy is Bernstein and Others v Bester NO and Others. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 12:54 pm
Nevertheless, although defendant waived his right to appear in person and to submit materials, there is no indication in the record before us that he waived his right to a hearing (see generally People v Costas, 46 AD3d 475, lv denied 10 NY3d 716). [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 10:55 am
Michael v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:14 am
In Pfeffer v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Chandler III's carefully reasoned decision in Fisk Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 2:42 am
” Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:33 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:11 pm
Tire Stores Inc. v. [read post]
