Search for: "US v. Love" Results 8401 - 8420 of 9,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2009, 3:11 pm by tysonsnow
  My loving wife (who is a “real” IP lawyer–a patent attorney, as opposed to the rest of us “soft” IP lawyers–also known as IP litigators) cut me some slack and I pounded out a piece that is now prominently displayed on JDSupra’s blog and in JDSupra’s hot documents: Amazon.com’s Objection to Proposed Settlement in “Authors Guild v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 3:11 pm by tysonsnow
  My loving wife (who is a “real” IP lawyer–a patent attorney, as opposed to the rest of us “soft” IP lawyers–also known as IP litigators) cut me some slack and I pounded out a piece that is now prominently displayed on JDSupra’s blog and in JDSupra’s hot documents: Amazon.com’s Objection to Proposed Settlement in “Authors Guild v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 12:43 am
In July the New Jersey courts released an opinion (Sengart v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 4:29 am
(For a taste of the U.S. dispute, see Havana Club Holding, S.A. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:16 pm
Their solution, no surprise, is to resuscitate the “hot news” rule under the 1918 INS v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 8:05 am
I of course ask this as I have a vested interest in clarifying my own thinking over the many intertwined issues in such cases and would love to hear from all of you.I would also very much value if someone could point me to where I could educate myself better on the essential differences between the First Amendment rights in the US and the constitutional position in India.Tarunabh Khaitan:I think Sundeep's suggestion for an Indian ACLU is a very important one, and perhaps… [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:39 am
I used to love that service until poor customer relations drove me away. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 10:23 am
Jack says he'd love to debate that, as would many of us, but what would be the point? [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 10:16 am
Successfully sued suggests that these cases were tried to a verdict, which in the case of Grillo v Pettiete et al Cause 96-145090-92 and Grillo v Henry Cause 96-167943-96 96th Dist, Ct Tarrant County, TX, simply wasn't true. [read post]